Critique as Collaboration in Design Anthropology
Keywords:critique, collaboration, design, anthropology, distributed
Design anthropology is an emerging field at the intersection of design and anthropology with a distinct style of knowing. This paper argues that in order to create transdisciplinary practices around collaboration for design anthropology, the field must understand existing practices of critique in the field of design. Based on a two-year National Science Foundation funded study of collaboration with designers and design educators in four countries, this article describes the culture of critique that underpins the collaborative practices of designers. In particular, designers often participate in a studio-based culture of critique, which is learned in art and design schools, even when it is not explicitly taught. Finally, as the field of design anthropology matures to include global networks of scholars and practitioners, it is useful to consider the ways in which emergent practices of critique as collaboration, supported by digital platforms, might move beyond the design studio and into distributed collaborations.
Agre, Philip. (1997). Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 131-157.
Buchanan, Richard. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056
Buster, Kendall, & Crawford, Paula. (2009). The Critique Handbook: The Art Students' Sourcebook and Survival Guide. Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Choy, Timothy K, Faier, Lieba, Hathaway, Michael J, Inoue, Miyako, Satsuka, Shiho, & Tsing, Anna. (2009). A new form of collaboration in cultural anthropology: Matsutake worlds. American Ethnologist, 36(2), 380-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2009.01141.x
Connor, Adam, & Irizarry, Aaron. (2015). Discussing Design: Improving Communication and Collaboration Through Critique. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Cummings, Jonathon, Finholt, Thomas, Foster, Ian, Kesselman, Carl, & Lawrence, Katherine A. (2008). Beyond being there: A blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organizations. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
Dannels, Deanna P. (2005). Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of "crits" in design studios. Communication Education, 54(2), 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500213165
Dannels, Deanna P., Gaffney, Amy L. Housley, & Martin, Kelly Norris. (2011). Students' talk about the climate of feedback interventions in the critique. Communication Education, Vol 60(Issue 1), pp.95-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.487111
DiSalvo, Carl. (2012). Adversarial design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farías, I. , & Wilkie, A. (Eds.). (2015). Studio Studies: Operations, Topologies & Displacements. New York: Routledge.
Flanagan, Mary, Howe, Daniel, & Nissenbaum, Helen. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. Information technology and moral philosophy, 322-353.
Flanagan, Mary, & Nissenbaum, Helen. (2014). Values at Play in Digital Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fleming, David. (1998). Design Talk: Constructing the Object in Studio Conversations. Design Issues, Vol 14(No 2), pp. 41-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511850
Forlano, Laura. (2008). When Code Meets Place: Collaboration and Innovation at WiFi Hotspots. (Ph.D.), Columbia University, New York.
Forlano, Laura. (2009). WiFi Geographies: When Code Meets Place. The Information Society, 25, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240903213076
Forlano, Laura, & Mazé, Ramia. (forthcoming). Demonstrating and Anticipating in Distributed Design Practices. Demonstrations.
Friedman, Batya, & Nissenbaum, Helen. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 14(3), 330-347. https://doi.org/10.1145/230538.230561
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Gunn, Wendy, Otto, Ton, & Smith, Rachel Charlotte. (2013). Design anthropology: theory and practice. New York: Bloombsbury.
Hillgren, Per-Anders, Seravalli, Anna, & Emilson, Anders. (2011). Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation. CoDesign, 7(3-4), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630474
Lerman, Liz, & Borstel, John. (2003). Critical Response Process: a method for getting useful feedback on anything you make, from dance to dessert. Takoma Park, MD: Dance Exchange, Inc.
Marcus, George E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
Mouffe, Chantal. (2003). Pluralism, dissensus and democratic citizenship. II Seminário internacional educação intercultural, gênero e movimentos sociais. Identidade, diferença, mediações, 1-10.
Neeley, Tsedal. (2012). Global Team Leaders Must Deliberately Create ‘Moments’ Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/03/global_team_leaders_must_delib.html
Oak, Arlene. (2011). What can talk tell us about design? Analyzing conversation to understand practice. Design Studies, 32(3), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.11.003
Oh, Y., et al.. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34(3), 302-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004
Osborn, Alex (1953). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. New York, NY: Charles Schribner's Sons.
Pickering, Andrew. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001
Ratto, Matt. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society, 27(4), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819
Reckwitz, Andreas. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European journal of social theory, 5(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
Redström, Johan. (2017). Making Design Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rooksby, John, & Ikeya, Nozomi. (2012). Collaboration in Formative Design: Working Together at a Whiteboard. IEEE Software, pp. 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2011.123
Sanders, Elizabeth B-N. (2002). From user-centered to participatory design approaches. Design and the social sciences: Making connections, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Sanders, Elizabeth B. -N., & Stappers, Pieter Jan. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Schuler, Douglas, & Namioka, Aki. (1993). Participatory design : principles and practices. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Shove, Elizabeth, Pantzar, Mika, & Watson, Matt. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes: Sage Publications.
Sobol, Daniel. (2012). Innovation is about arguing, not brainstorming. Here’s how to argue productively. Retrieved from http://www.fastcodesign.com/1669329/dont-brainstorm-argue
Soep, Elisabeth. (2005). Where art meets assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol 87(No 1), 38-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700109
Strauss, A. . (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wakkary, Ron, Odom, William, Hauser, Sabrina, Hertz, Garnet, & Lin, Henry. (2015). Material speculation: Actual artifacts for critical inquiry. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.
Whitworth, Brian, & Friedman, Rob. (2009a). Reinventing academic publishing online. Part I: Rigor, relevance and practice. First Monday, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i8.2609
Whitworth, Brian, & Friedman, Rob. (2009b). Reinventing academic publishing online. Part II: A socio-technical vision. First Monday, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i9.2642
Zimmerman, John, Forlizzi, Jodi, & Evenson, Shelley. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).