Data Is No Free Gift: An Anthropological Perspective on Data Sharing in an Inter-Organizational Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v13i1.6586Abstract
Organizational research on data sharing in inter-organizational contexts is limited, giving little insight into why data is or is not shared, often bypassing social and cultural norms, values and perspectives, and issues of power, (dis)trust, and (un)willingness to share. Drawing on an empirical study in the infrastructure sector in the Netherlands, where administrators increasingly urge infrastructure operators to share their data to create a more integrated and resilient infrastructure network, we ask: How is data sharing enabled and constrained according to organizational actors of critical infrastructure operators? Our findings exhibit five perceived challenges and five opportunities of sharing data, providing two main contributions to business anthropology and organization studies. Theoretically, we reconceptualize data sharing as “gift-giving,” helping to identify and understand the human-centered facets hitherto overlooked such as the reciprocal relations and cultural tensions associated with inter-organizational data exchange. Empirically, contributing in a more pragmatic sense, we add the notion of “enclosing” which entails the situational exchange of mutually agreed upon, limited data among pre-selected organizations via a bounded platform. We suggest that the enclosed platforms provide a context conducive for reciprocal data-gifting and a framework for future practical applications of data sharing in (inter)organizational settings.
References
Anand, N., Gupta, A., and Appel, H. (2018). The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002031
Bailey, C. A. (2007). A Guide to Qualitative Field Research. Thousand Oaks: Pine Press Forge. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983204
Biersteker, E. and Marrewijk, A. V. (2023). “Integrating Knowledge in Infrastructure Projects: The Interplay Between Formal and Informal Knowledge Governance Mechanisms.” Construction Management and Economics 41(10): 859-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2210695
Birchall, C. (2011). “Introduction to ‘Secrecy and Transparency’: The Politics of Opacity and Openness.” Theory, Culture & Society 28(7-8): 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411427744
Boellstorff, T. and Maurer, B. (eds.) (2015). Data, Now Bigger and Better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Christensen, L. T. and Cheney, G. (2014). “Peering into Transparency: Challenging Ideals, Proxies, and Organizational Practices.” Communication Theory 25(1): 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12052
Davis, E. (2015). Techgnosis: Myth, Magic & Mysticism in the Age of Information. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Deloitte (2017). New Technologies Case Study: Data Sharing in Infrastructure. National Infrastructure Commission.
Dobusch, L., Dobusch, L., and Müller-Seitz, G. (2019). “Closing for the Benefit of Openness? The Case of Wikimedia’s Open Strategy Process.” Organization Studies 40(3): 343-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736930
Elder-Vass, D. (2016). Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316536421
Engelhart, J., Roehrich, J. K., and Squire, B. (2023). “Governing Inter-Organisational Relationships in Large Projects: A Review and Future Research Agenda.” In G. Winch, M. Brunet, and C. Dongping (eds.), Research Handbook on Complex Project Organizing (pp. 213-222). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880283.00032
Ferryman, K. (2017). “Reframing Data as a Gift.” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000631 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3000631
Fourcade, M. and Kluttz, D. N. (2020). “A Maussian Bargain: Accumulation by Gift in the Digital Economy.” Big Data & Society 7(1): https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897092
Gerrits, L. and Verweij, S. (2018). The Evaluation of Complex Infrastructure Projects: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478422
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., and Hamilton, A. L. (2013). “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia methodology.” Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). “The Norm of Reciprocity : A Preliminary Statement Author.” American Sociological Review 25: 161-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Gregg, M. (2015). “The Gift That Is Not Given.” In T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer (eds.), Data, Now Bigger and Better (pp. 47-66). Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Gupta, A. (2018). “The Future in Ruins: Thoughts on the Temporality of Infrastructures.” In N. Anand, A. Gupta, and H. Appel (eds.), The Promise of Infrastructure (pp. 62-80). Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002031-003
Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Random House. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406704024
Harari, Y. N. (2017). “Dataism Is Our New God.” New Perspectives Quarterly 34(2): 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.12080
Harvey, F. and Tulloch, D. (2006). “Local‐Government Data Sharing: Evaluating the Foundations of Spatial Data Infrastructures.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(7): 743-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661607
Harvey, P., Jensen, C. B., and Morita, A. (eds.) (2017). Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622880
Harvey, P. and Knox, H. (2015). Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise. London: Cornell University Press.
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., and Whittington, R. (2017). “Open Strategy: Dimensions, Dilemmas, Dynamics.” Long Range Planning 50(3): 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.12.001
Hazell, P., Novitzky, P., and van den Oord, S. (2023). “Socio-Technical System Analysis of Responsible Data Sharing in Water Systems as Critical Infrastructure.” Frontiers in Big Data 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.1057155
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055
Jalali Sohi, A., Nezami, M. R., Bakker, H., and Hertogh, M. (2021). “Inter-Organizational Co-Creation: An Approach to Support Energy Transition Projects.” In: R. Cuevas, C. N. Bodea, and P. Torres-Lima (eds), Research on Project, Programme and Portfolio Management: Integrating Sustainability into Project Management (pp. 151-166). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60139-3_11
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., and Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government.” Information Systems Management 29(4): 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Jones, C. and Lichtenstein, B. (2008). “Temporary Inter-Organizational Projects: How Temporal and Social Embeddedness Enhance Coordination and Manage Uncertainty.” In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. S. Ring (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations (pp. 231-255). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199282944.003.0009
Kapogiannis, G. and Sherratt, F. (2018). “Impact of Integrated Collaborative Technologies to Form a Collaborative Culture in Construction Projects.” Built Environment Project and Asset Management 8(1): 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2017-0043
Kitchin, R. (2014). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
Konstantinou, E. and Fincham, R. (2011). “Not Sharing But Trading: Applying a Maussian Exchange Framework to Knowledge Management.” Human Relations 64(6): 823-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710388676
Larkin, B. (2013). “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42(1): 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
Larkin, B. (2018). “Promising Forms: The Political Aesthetics of Infrastructure.” In N. Anand, A. Gupta, and H. Appel (eds.), The Promise of Infrastructure (pp. 175-202). London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002031-008
Laursen, K. and Salter, A. J. (2014). “The Paradox of Openness: Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration.” Research Policy 43(5): 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
Lenfle, S. and Söderlund, J. (2018). “Large-Scale Innovative Projects as Temporary Trading Zones: Toward an Interlanguage Theory.” Organization Studies 40(11): 1713-1739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618789201
Maurer, I. (2010). “How to Build Trust in Inter-Organizational Projects: The Impact of Project Staffing and Project Rewards on the Formation of Trust, Knowledge Acquisition and Product Innovation.” International Journal of Project Management 28(7): 629-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.006
Mauss, M. (2002). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203407448
Munns, A. K. (1995). “Potential Influence of Trust on Successful Completion of a Project.” International Journal of Project Management 13(1): 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)95699-E
Nezami, M. R., de Bruijne, M. L., Hertogh, M. J., and Bakker, H. L. (2022). “Collaboration and Data Sharing in Inter-Organizational Infrastructure Construction Projects.” Sustainability 14(24): 16835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416835
Nezami, M. R., de Bruijne, M. L., Hertogh, M. J., and Bakker, H. L. (2023). “Inter-Organizational Collaboration in Interconnected Infrastructure Projects.” Sustainability 15(8): 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086721
O'Dell, P. (2010). Silver Bullets: How Interoperable Data Will Revolutionize Information Sharing and Transparency. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). “Social Anthropology of Technology.” Annual Review Anthropology 21: 491-516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.21.1.491
Romele, A. and Severo, M. (2016). “The Economy of the Digital Gift: From Socialism to Sociality Online.” Theory, Culture & Society 33(5): 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415619474
Sahlins, M. (1973). “On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange.” In M. Banton (ed.), The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology (pp. 139-236). London: Tavistock.
Schut, D. (2020). “Data delen en simultaan schaken.” NGinfra Magazine 1. Retrieved from https://www.nginfra.nl/magazines-archief
Star, S. (1999). “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Swärd, A. (2016). “Trust, Reciprocity, and Actions: The Development of Trust in Temporary Inter-Organizational Relations.” Organisation Studies 37(12): 1841-1860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655488
Tett, G. (2015). The Silo Effect: The Peril of Expertise and the Promise of Breaking Down Barriers. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Tett, G. (2018). “Language Matters: The Real Meaning of Big Data.” Financial Times Magazine. Retrieved June 6, 2024 from https://www.ft.com/content/bd88b9f2-e79f-11e8-8a85-04b8afea6ea3
Thorén, C., Ågerfalk, P. J., and Rolandsson, B. (2018). “Voicing the Puppet: Accommodating Unresolved Institutional Tensions in Digital Open Practices.” Organization Studies 39(7): 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617695358
Tsoukas, H. (1997). “The Tyranny of Light: The Temptations and the Paradoxes of the Information Society.” Futures 29(9): 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00035-9
Tuomi, I. (1999). “Data Is More Than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory.” Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. HICSS-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772795
Van Marrewijk, A. and van den Ende, L. (2022). “Shaping Interorganizational Strategic Projects Through Power Relations and Strategic Practices.” International Journal of Project Management 40(4): 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.008
Van Marrewijk, A. H. and Dessing, N. S. S. (2019). “Negotiating Reciprocal Relationships: Practices of Engaged Scholarship in Project Studies.” International Journal of Project Management 37(7): 884-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.07.001
Van Marrewijk, A. H., Ybema, S., Smits, K., Clegg, S. R., and Pitsis, T. (2016). “Clash of the Titans: Temporal Organizing and Collaborative Dynamics in the Panama Canal Megaproject.” Organization Studies 37(12): 1745-1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655489
Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd edition. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.
Wolbers, J., Boersma, K., and Groenewegen, P. (2017). “Introducing a Fragmentation Perspective on Coordination in Crisis Management.” Organization Studies 39(11): 1521-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717095
Wong, W. K., Cheung, S. O., Yui, T. W., and Pang, H. Y. (2008). “A Framework for Trust in Construction Contracting.” International Journal of Project Management 26(8): 821-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.11.004
Yanow, D. (2006). “Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Presuppositions and the Human Sciences.” In D. Yanow (ed.), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn (pp. 5-26). New York: M.E. Sharpe. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315703275-2
Yoo, Y., Boland Jr, R. J., Lyytinen, K., and Majchrzak, A. (2012). “Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World.” Organization Science 23(5): 1398-1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
Zins, C. (2007). “Conceptual Approaches for Defining Data, Information, and Knowledge.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(4): 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20508
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ende, Leonore van den, Marrewijk, Alfons van
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
