Stations of the Self: Aesthetics and Ascetics in Foucault’s Conversion Narrative

Authors

  • Christopher Yates Boston College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i8.2933

Abstract

Based primarily on his 1981-1982 course, The Hermeneutics of the Subject, I contend that Michel Foucault’s robust treatment of ancient models for self-salvation answers his systematic problem of a lost spiritual art of living primarily through a sustained dichotomy between the Hellenistic-Roman and Christian models of conversion. In this way his intended recovery of an aesthetic-ascetic spiritual “resistance” is accomplished through a methodology of resistance. He relies on an accelerating arrangement of polarities between the aim and practice of immanent self-return and what he takes to be the coercive discourses of transcendent self-renunciation. Though such historiography may raise questions for some readers, my aim is simply to show how, for Foucault, the dichotomizing is necessary for grounding his own understanding of the art of ”conversion.”

Author Biography

Christopher Yates, Boston College

Christopher Yates is a Teaching Fellow and Ph.D candidate in philosophy at Boston College. His primary research interests include nineteenth- and twentieth-centuries European thought, with an emphasis in phenomenology and aesthetics.

Downloads

Published

2010-02-01

How to Cite

Yates, C. (2010). Stations of the Self: Aesthetics and Ascetics in Foucault’s Conversion Narrative. Foucault Studies, (8), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i8.2933

Issue

Section

Articles