Field Report: Implementing a Social Science Capability in a Marine Corps Organization

  • Kerry B. Fosher
Keywords: military, implementation, action anthropology, translational research, practicing anthropology

Abstract

In 2010 the Marine Corps started a small, experimental capability, the Translational Research Group (TRG), to help the organization more effectively integrate social science and scientists into decision-making. In contrast to other recent military social science programs, TRG focuses inward, on Marines and Marine Corps organizations. The group houses fieldwork-focused social scientists within a military organization so they can understand the problem-framing context and implementation processes, but provides significantly greater academic freedom and protection from over-tasking than is the norm in military research settings. Researchers conduct independently designed projects, support curriculum development, and provide social science advice to a broad scope of military organizations. Although leadership support for the group has been strong, there have been significant impediments to fully institutionalizing the capability. This field report provides an outline of the background and design of the group and examines some of the key challenges encountered during implementation. 

References

Albro, Robert, et al. 2012 Anthropologists in the securityscape : ethics, practice, and professional identity. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

Albro, Robert, et al. 2009 AAA Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities (CEAUSSIC) Final Report on The Army's Human Terrain System Proof of Concept Program. American Anthropological Association.

Deitchman, Seymour J. 2014 [1976] The Best-Laid Schemes : A Tale of Social Research and Bureaucracy. (2nd Edition). Quantico, VA: Marine Corps University Press.

DiIulio, John J. 2014 Bring back the bureaucrats : why more federal workers will lead to better (and smaller!) government. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.

Elmendorf, Douglas W. 2015 Federal Contracts and the Contracted Workforce: Response to Inqury from Congressional Representative Chris Van Hollen. Congressional Budget Office, U.S. Congress.

Fosher, Kerry 2010 Yes, Both, Absolutely: A Personal and Professional Commentary on Anthropological Engagement with Military and Intelligence Organizations. In Anthropology and global counterinsurgency. J.D. Kelly, B. Jauregui, S.T. Mitchell, and J. Walton, eds. Pp. 261-271. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Fosher, Kerry 2015 Reflections on Current Research: Science and Scientists in Military Organizations. Journal of Culture, Language, and International Security 1(2):47-58.

Hoag, Colin 2011 Assembling Partial Perspectives: Thoughts on the Anthropology of Bureaucracy. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34(1):81-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01140.x

Hull, Matthew S. 2012 Government of paper : the materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520272149.001.0001

Inhorn, Marcia Claire, and Emily A. Wentzell 2012 Medical anthropology at the intersections : histories, activisms, and futures. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395478

Jogalekar, Ashutosh 2012 The perils of translational research. In Scientific American (The Curious Wavefunction), Vol. 2017: Scientific American.

Marcellino, William M., and Frank Jr. Tortorello 2015 'I Don’t Think I Would Have Recovered’: A Personal and Sociocultural Study of Resilience among US Marines. Armed Forces & Society 41(3).

Nolan, Riall W. 2002 Development anthropology : encounters in the real world. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Nolan, Riall W. 2013 The handbook of practicing anthropology. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118486597

Peacock, James, et al. 2007 AAA Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities Final Report. American Anthropological Association.

Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron B. Wildavsky 1984 Implementation : how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland : or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Price, David H. 2011 Weaponizing anthropology : social science in the service of the militarized state. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Rubinstein, Robert A. 1986 Reflections on Action Anthropology: Some Developmental Dynamics of an Anthropological Tradition. Human Organization 45(3):270-279. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.45.3.j0r1w186w2162140

Rubinstein, Robert A., Kerry B. Fosher, and Clementine K. Fujimura 2012 Practicing military anthropology : beyond expectations and traditional boundaries. Sterling, Va.: Kumarian Press.

Schensul, Jean J. 1999 Using ethnographic data interventions, public programming and public policy. Walnut Creek, Calif.: Altamira Press.

Tortorello, Frank Jr. 2014 Stress and Resilience in the U.S. Marine Corps. Marine Corps Gazette 98(6):30-33.

Tortorello, Frank Jr., and William M. Marcellino 2013 Military Resilience, Suicide, and Post-Traumatic Stress: What's Behind it All? In Foreign Policy: Best Defense. T. Ricks, ed, Vol. 2017.

United States Department of Defense 2017 About the Department of Defense (DOD), Vol. 2017.

Woolf, S. H. 2008 The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 299(2):211-213. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.26

Zabusky, Stacia E. 1995 Launching Europe: An Ethnography of European Cooperation in Space Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Published
2018-04-23
Section
Articles