The Future Airport – Experiments and Innovative Technologies
AbstractZooming in on the micro-processes involved in developing and user testing new technologies for airports, this article works with the notion of experiments as a way to understand iterative practices and future (re)orientations. In doing so, I aim to think through experiences and experiments with applied anthropology and corporate ethnography within a dialogic framework of 1) current airport industry efforts of re-visioning stakeholder collaboration and airport re-branding and 2) the attempts of a Danish start-up company to create market disruption through innovative technology development. Although the experiments take place at different scales and are performed in different ways, I contend that they must be considered within a common frame in order to tease out their interconnectedness, particularly with regards to experimental confines and motivations. Based on some relatively raw case material, this article unfolds the different layers of experiments and the underlying assumptions that they make apparent.
Adey, Peter. 2003. "Secured and Sorted Mobilities: Examples from the Airport." Surveillance & Society 1 (4):500-519. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3333.
Augé, Marc. 1995. Non-places. Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London, New York: Verso.
Budd, Lucy C. S. 2012. "Airports: from flying fields to twenty-first century aerocities." In International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities, edited by Ben Derudder, Michael Hoyler, Peter J. Taylor and Frank Witlox, 151-161. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Volume 1: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chalfin, Brenda. 2008. "Sovereigns and citizens in close encounter: Airport anthropology and customs regimes in neoliberal Ghana." American Ethnologist 35 (4):519-538. http://www.jstor.org.ep.fjernadgang.kb.dk/stable/27667510.
Chalfin, Brenda. 2010. Neoliberal frontiers. An ethnography of sovereignty in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Corsín Jiménez, Alberto. 2014. "Introduction. The prototype: more than many and less than one." Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4):381-398. https://doi-org.ep.fjernadgang.kb.dk/10.1080/17530350.2013.858059.
Corsín Jiménez, Alberto, and Adolfo Estalella. 2010. "The prototype: a sociology in abeyance." Limn (Issue Number Zero: Prototyping Prototyping. http://limn.it/the-prototype-a-sociology-in-abeyance/).
Dahler-Larsen, Peter. 1998. Den rituelle reflektion, om evaluering i organisationer. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
Gregg, Melissa, and Stacey Peel. 2015. "Surviving Security: Humanizing the Passenger Screening Checkpoint." The Future of Air Travel Initiative, http://omediaweb.wixsite.com/foat/whitepapers.
Haines, Julia Katherine. 2016. "Meaningful Innovation: Ethnographic Potential in the Startup and Venture Capital Sphere." Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings:175-200. https://www.epicpeople.org/meaningful-innovation/.
Harwood, John. 2011. The Interface: IBM and the Transformation of Corporate Design, 1945–1976. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Houde, Stephanie, and Charles Hill. 1997. "What do Prototypes Prototype?" In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, edited by Martin Helander, Thomas Landauer and Prasad Prabhu, 367-381. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Høst, Vibe. 2015. "Lufthavnens transitområde i et oplevelsesøkonomisk perspektiv." Speciale i Kommunikation, Roskilde Universitet.
Kemmis, Stephen, and Robin MC Taggart. 2000. "Paricipatory Action Research." In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 567-605. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Korsby, Trine Mygind, and Anthony Stavrianakis. 2016. "Moments in Collaboration: Experiments in Concept Work." Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology Published online 16 Mar 2016:1-19.
Lassiter, Luke Eric. 2005. "Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology." Current Anthropology 46 (1):83-106. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/425658
Leach, James. 2014. "Choreographic Objects." Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4):458-475.
Lloyd, Justine. 2003. "Airport Technology, Travel, and Consumption." Space and Culture 6 (2):93-109.
Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. "Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives." In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, edited by Diego Gambetta, 94-107. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford: http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/luhmann94-107.pdf
Maguire, Mark. 2012. "Biopower, racialization and new security technology." Social Identities. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 18 (5):593-607.
Marcus, George. 2014. "Prototyping and Contemporary Anthropological Experiments With Ethnographic Method." Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4):399-410.
Marres, Noortje. 2012. "The experiment in living." In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by C. Lury and N. Wakeford, 76-95. London: Routledge.
Martin, Lauren L. 2010. "Bombs, bodies, and biopolitics: securitizing the subject at the airport security checkpoint." Social & Cultural Geography 11 (17-34).
Moreland, Jeanette Rose. 2013. "The anthropology of airports: Security and the apparatuses of state borders." MA thesis in Anthropology, Binghamton University, State University of New York.
Rabinow, Paul. 2014a. "An Experiment in Discordancy: Reflections on Familiarity, Trust, and Confidence in Synthetic Biology." In The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary, edited by Paul Rabinow, 154-176. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rabinow, Paul. 2014b. "Venues: The Labinar and the Anthropology of the Contemporary Research Collaboratory." In The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary, edited by Paul Rabinow, 127-153. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2009. "Experimental Reorientations." In Going Amiss in Experimental Research, edited by Giora Hon, Jutta Schickore and Friedrich Steinle, 75-89. New York: Springer.
Rudd, Jim, Ken Stern, and Scott Isensee. 1996. "Low vs. High-Fidelity Prototyping Debate." Interactions 3 (1):76-85.
Salter, Mark B. 2007. "Governmentalities of an Airport: Heterotopia and Confession." International Political Sociology 1 (1):49-66.
Savoia, Alberto. 2011. Pretotype It. Make sure you are building the right it before you build it right. Second Pretotype Edition. http://www.pretotyping.org/uploads/1/4/0/9/14099067/pretotype_it_2nd_pretotype_edition-2.pdf.
Sedgwick, Mitchell W. 2017. "Complicit Positioning: Anthropological Knowledge and Problems of 'Studying Up' for Ethnographer-Employees of Corporations." Journal of Business Anthropology 6 (1):58-88.
Sharma, Sarah. 2009. "Baring Life and Lifestyle in the Non-place." Cultural Studies 23 (1):129-148.
SITA. 2015. The Passenger IT Trends Survey. Air Transport Industry Insights. In http://www.sita.aero/globalassets/docs/surveys--reports/passenger-it-trends-survey-2015.pdf
Wilkie, Alex. 2014. "Prototyping as Event: Designing the Future of Obesity." Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4):476-492.
Copyright (c) 2019 Helene Ilkjær
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).