Inspiring Brand Positionings with Mixed Qualitative Methods
A Case of Pet Food
Qualitative research is often used by marketers to develop new brand positionings. This case illustrates how two sequentially applied qualitative approaches were used to generate positionings for a pet food brand. The methods included psychologically oriented focus groups and anthropologically informed ethnographies. When implemented independently by a single market research company, the two approaches inspired highly distinctive brand positionings. The focus groups sparked a positioning on the resolution of cognitive dissonance; the ethnographies spawned a positioning that entailed a re-conceptualization of the pet food category as a means to elevate the brand. The case concludes by considering the merits and limitations of the methods and the interdisciplinary approach overall. This research design may have promise for marketing practitioners and academics, and for consumer anthropologists in particular who have concerns that mixed qualitative methods can compromise anthropology’s discipline-specific strengths.
Belk, Russel W. 1996. Metaphoric Relationships with Pets. Society and Animals. 4 (2): 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853096X00115
Belk, Russell W., Eileen Fischer, and Robert Kozinets. 2013. Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Bettanry, Shona and Russel W. Belk. 2011. “Disney Discourses of Self and Other: Animality, Primitivity, Modernity, and Postmodernity.” Consumption Markets & Culture. 14 (2): 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2011.562017
Bishop, S.R., Shapiro, Lau, M., Carlson, S., et al. 2004. “Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 11 (3): 230-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077
Charles, Nickie and Charlotte Aull Davies. 2008. “My Family and Other Animals: Pets as Kin.” Sociological Research Online 13 (5): 4. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/5/4.html https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1798
Denny, Rita M. and Patricia L. Sunderland, eds. 2014. Handbook of Anthropology in Business. Walnut Creek, LA: Left Coast Press.
Dravcott. S. and A. Dabbs. 1998. “Cognitive dissonance. 1: An overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 37 (Pt 3): 341-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01390.x
Festinger, Leo. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. California: Stanford University Press.
Fox, Rebekah. 2006. “Animal Behaviours, Post-Human Lives: Everyday Negotiations of the Animal-Human Divide in Pet-Keeping.” Social & Cultural Geography 7 (4): 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825679
Gummesson, Evert. 2005. “Qualitative Research in Marketing: Roadmap for a Wilderness of Complexity and Unpredictability.” European Journal of Marketing 39 (3/4): 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510581791
Hackley, Chris. 2019. Qualitative Research in Marketing and Management: Doing Interpretive Research Projects. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429446801
Hasbrouck, Jay. 2018. Ethnographic Thinking: From Method to Mindset. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203712290
Jedidi, Kamel, Robert J. Morais, and Yegor Tkachenko. 2019. “All Nutrition: Market Research to Drive Customer Segmentation.” Columbia Caseworks. https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/caseworks/node/740/All%2BNutrition%253A%2BMarket%2BResearch%2Bto%2BDrive%2BCustomer%2BSegmentation
Jick, Todd D. 1979. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (4): 602-611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
Jordan, Ann. 2019. “Business Anthropology.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Online publication: October. https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-4 https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.4
Kottak, Conrad. 2006. Mirror for Humanity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Krueger, Rich A. and Mary Anne Casey. 2015. Focus Groups: A Guide for Applied Research. 5th Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Kuper, Adam. 1999. Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ladner, Sam. 2019. Mixed Methods: A Short Guide to Applied Mixed Methods Research. Amazon Digital Services.
Madsbjerg, Christian and Mikkel B. Rasmussen, 2014. The Moment of Clarity: Using the Human Sciences to Solve Your Toughest Business Problems. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Malefyt, Timothy de Waal and Robert J. Morais. 2012. Advertising and Anthropology: Ethnographic Practice and Cultural Perspectives. Oxford: Berg.
— 2019. “Proceedings of the 2019 Global Business Anthropology Summit.” Journal of Business Anthropology. 8 (2): 308-341. https://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/jba/article/view/5854/6532 https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v8i2.5854
Malhotra, Naresh K and Satyabhusan Dash. 2017. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. 7th Edition. Noida, India: Pearson.
Maschio, Tom. 2015. “Everyday things: an anthropologist’s take on emotion and the sense of the sacred in consumer rituals.” Journal of Business Anthropology 4 (2): 342-351. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v4i2.4896
Maslow, A. H. 1943. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50 (4): 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
McCabe, Maryann. 2014. “Configuring Family, Kinship & Natural Cosmology: Branding Pet Food.” In Handbook of Anthropology in Business, Rita M. Denny and Patricia L. Sunderland, eds. Pp. 362-378. Walnut Creek, LA: Left Coast Press.
ed. 2016. Collaborative Ethnography in Business Environments. New York: Routledge.
McCabe, Maryann and Elizabeth Briody, eds., 2016. Special Issue #2: Liminality. Journal of Business Anthropology. Spring.
McCabe, Maryann and Rita Denny. 2019. “Anthropology in Consumer Research.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Online publication: October. https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-9?rskey=08xsOp&result=3 https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.9
McCracken, Grant. 2009. Chief Culture Officer. Philadelphia: Basic Books.
Milliken, J. 2001. “Qualitative research and marketing management.” Management Decision 39 (1): 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005409
Morais, Robert J. 2010. Refocusing Focus Groups. Ithaca, NY: Paramount Market Publishing.
Morais, Robert J. and Timothy de Waal Malefyt. 2010. “How Anthropologists Can Succeed in Business: Mediating Multiple Worlds of Inquiry.” International Journal of Business Anthropology 1(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.33423/ijba.v1i1.1204
Okraku, Therese Kennelly, Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, Raffaele Vacca, and Christopher McCarty. 2017. “A Mixed Method Approach for Identifying Emerging Fields and Building Collaborative Teams: Leveraging Network Ethnography to Design Experimental Interventions.” EPIC Proceedings. Pp. 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2017.01146
Patel, Neal H. 2014. “Methodological Rebellion: Overcoming the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.” In Handbook of Anthropology in Business, Rita M. Denny and Patricia L. Sunderland, eds. Pp. 135-156. Walnut Creek, LA: Left Coast Press.
Pelto, Pertti J. 2015. “What is so new about mixed methods?” Qualitative Health Research 25 (6): 734–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573209
Pink, Sarah, Tom O’Dell, and Vaike Fors. 2017. “Introduction. Theoretical Scholarship and Applied Practice: Opportunities and Challenges of Working in the In-between.” In Theoretical Scholarship and Applied Practice, Sarah Pink, Vaike Fors. and Tom O’Dell. eds. Pp. 4-28. New York and Oxford: Berghahn. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04bkj.5
Porter, Pete. 2009. “Journeys Towards an Authentic Self.” Society and Animals 17 (4): 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1163/106311109X12474622855345
Rattenbury, Tye and Dawn Nafus. 2018. “Data Science and Ethnography: What’s Our Common Ground, and Why Does It Matter?” Epic Perspectives. https://www.epicpeople.org/data-science-and-ethnography/
Ries, Al and Jack Trout. 1981. Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rodrıguez-Mejıa, Fredy R., Elizabeth K. Briody, Ruth Rothstein, and Edward J. Berger. 2020. “Implementing Grassroots Initiatives of Change: The Combined Perspectives from Psychology and Anthropology in an Engineering School.” International Journal of Engineering Education 36 (3): 1097–1116.
Shir-Vertesh, Dafna. 2012. “’Flexible Personhood’: Loving Animals as Family Members in Israel.” American Anthropologist 114 (3): 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x
Sunderland, Patricia L. and Denny, Rita M. 2003. “Psychology vs. Anthropology: Where is Culture in Marketplace Ethnography?” In Advertising Cultures, Timothy de Waal Malefyt and Brian Moeran, eds. Pp. 187-202. Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084389-9
Sunderland, Patricia L. and Denny, Rita M. 2007. Doing Anthropology in Consumer Research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Turner, Victor W. 1964. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage.” In The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society, Symposium on New Approaches to the Study of Religion, Pp. 4-20. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Aldine: New York.
Van Gennep, Arnold. 1960 (1909). The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226027180.001.0001
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).