Ludo Tricks and the Unserious Actor in the Trucking Business
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v14i2.7416Abstract
Anthropological studies based on participant observation, with the goal of producing context-sensitive, holistic sociocultural descriptions of high-risk industries, are few and far between. This article focuses on the intentional bending and breaking of safety-related rules and regulations in the European road-based commercial goods transport sector. When accidents and other unwanted events occur in the sector, loss of life and material damage are often inevitable due to the high energies involved in truck accidents and crashes. Based on fieldwork in Norway, the article explores rule bending in day-to-day work across the transport chain, from terminal workers and truck drivers to transport company managers and owners. It highlights both the performances and the rationalizations of rule-bending behavior and provides a conceptualization of rule bending as actions that are continually deliberated in the sector and justified by the concept of “the unserious actor.” The main argument of the article is that this concept is a constructed category that both guides and restricts rule bending in the sector. This line of thinking draws on Fredrik Barth’s (2010) discussion of the continuous establishment and re-establishment of ethnic groups and boundaries – an approach that has not previously been used to understand safety and risk taking in the road-based heavy goods transport sector.
References
Barth, F. (1990). “The Guru and the Conjurer: Transactions in Knowledge and the Shaping of Culture in Southeast Asia and Melanesia.” Man 25(4): 640-653. https://doi.org/10.2307/2803658
Barth, F. (1994). Manifestasjon og Prosess. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Barth, F. (2010). “Introduction to Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference.” In M. Martiniello and J. Rath (eds.), Selected Studies in International Migration and Immigrant Incorporation (pp. 407-436). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Bell, R. C. (1979 [1960]). Board and Table Games from Many Civilizations. Vol. I (Revised Edition). New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Bode, C., Lindemann, E., and Wagner, S. M. (2011). “Driving Trucks and Driving Sales? The Impact of Delivery Personnel on Customer Purchase Behavior.” Journal of Business Logistics 32(1): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2158-1592.2011.01009.x
Carrier, J. G. and Miller, D. (1999). “From Private Virtue to Public Vice.” In H. L. Moore (ed.), Anthropological Theory Today (pp. 24-47). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Clarke, M. H. (2020). “Transportation and Change Through an Anthropological Lens.” Journal of Business Anthropology 9(2): 192-224. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v9i2.6122
Dalakoglou, D. and Harvey, P. (2012). “Roads and Anthropology: Ethnographic Perspectives on Space, Time and (Im)Mobility.” Mobilities 7(4): 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.718426
Deeb, H. N. and Marcus, G. E. (2011). “In the Green Room: An Experiment in Ethnographic Method at the WTO.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34(1): 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2011.01138.x
European Commission (2021). “Almost 29 Transport Workers Per 1,000 People in the EU.” Retrieved 27 November 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20210923-2
European Commission (2025). EU Transport in Figures – Statistical Pocketbook 2025. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2832/2584130
Feldman, G. (2011). “If Ethnography Is More Than Participant-Observation, Then Relations Are More Than Connections: The Case for Nonlocal Ethnography in a World of Apparatuses.” Anthropological Theory 11(4): 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611429904
FEEF – Forum for Ethics in Ethnographic Research (2023). “Ethical Guidelines in Ethnographic Research.” The Norwegian Anthropological Association. Retrieved 25 November 2025. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N8g_Za0JIlXNcfaq5H4F6YvstLprya6e/view
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Grytnes, R., Shibuya, H., Dyreborg, J., Grøn, S., and Cleal, B. (2016). “Too Individualistic for Safety Culture? Non-Traffic Related Work Safety among Heavy Goods Vehicle Drivers.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 40(Supplement C): 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.04.012
Hanson, N. (2021). “The Intersections of Global Capital and Family Rhythms in Truck Driving: Elucidating the Canadian Trucking Industry Labour Crisis.” Applied Mobilities 6(2): 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2020.1809969
Harvey, D. (2017). Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Komter, A. E. (2005). Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614064
Kuran, C. H. A. and Njå, O. (2016). “Rule Bending in the Road Based Commercial Goods Transport Sector – A Systems Theory Approach.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering, Belgrade.
Kuran, C. H. A., Newnam, S., and Beanland, V. (2022). “Adaptive Non-Conform Behaviour in Accident Investigations in the Road Based Heavy Goods Transport Sector.” Safety Science 146(105539): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105539
Lafontaine, F. and Valeri, L. M. (2005). “The Deregulation of International Trucking in the European Union: Form and Effect.” Law & Economics Working Papers Archive: 2003-2009 51. https://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_archive/art51
Leivestad, H. H. (2021). “Who Cares about the Cargo? Container Economies in a European Transshipment Port.” Focaal 89: 52-63. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2021.890105
Leivestad, H. H. and Markkula, J. (2021). “Inside Container Economies.” Focaal 89: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2021.890101
Mandel, E. (1975). “The Industrial Cycle in Late Capitalism.” New Left Review 90(3). https://doi.org/10.64590/oev
Marcus, G. E. (1995). “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24(1): 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
Marx, K. (2016 1844). “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” In W. Longhofer and D. Winchester (eds.), Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 152-158). New York: Routledge.
Mauss, M. (1966 [1925]). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West Ltd.
Narotsky, S. (2007). “The Project in the Model: Reciprocity, Social Capital, and the Politics of Ethnographic Realism.” Current Anthropology 48(3): 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/512999
NESH (2024). “Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities.” National Research Ethics Committees. www.researchethics.no
Njå, O., Braut, G. S., and Vika, O. E. (2012). “Bending Rules in the Commercial Goods Road Transport Sector.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 48: 2336-2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1205
Nóvoa, A. (2014). “‘A Country on Wheels’: A Mobile Ethnography of Portuguese Lorry Drivers.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46(12): 2834-2847. https://doi.org/10.1068/a140115p
Rosin, R. T. (2003). “Vishnu and the Art of Motorcycle Driving: Toward an Anthropology of Traffic.” Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 80/90: 55-74.
Simonič, P. (2019). “Alter Political Economy.” In P. Simonič (ed.), Anthropological Perspectives of Solidarity and Reciprocity (pp. 9-18). Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press. https://doi.org/10.4312/9789610601463
Sørli, V. L. (2005). In a Man´s World: Tolkninger av lovbrudd gjort i langtransportens yrkeskontekst. PhD Thesis, Stockholm University. Edsbruk: Akademitryck.
Tsing, A. (2009). “Supply Chains and the Human Condition.” Rethinking Marxism 21(2): 148-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690902743088
Webb, M. C. (1974). “Exchange Networks: Prehistory.” Annual Review of Anthropology 3(1): 357-383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.002041
Williams, A. and George, B. (2014). “Truck Drivers – the Under-Respected Link in the Supply Chain: a Quasi Ethnographic Perspective Using Qualitative Appreciative Inquiry.” Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 6(3): 85-93. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0150093
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christian Kuran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
