The Magical Power of Words in Large Language Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v15i1.7813Abstract
This essay reframes the discourse around large language models (LLMs) by drawing on anthropological and linguistic theories of magic as a positive transformative force. While current discussions often cast AI as mysteriously dangerous – a form of “dark magic” that beguiles users and obscures ethical concerns – we argue that LLMs represent a fundamental shift in human-technology interaction, one requiring ritualistic linguistic precision rather than technical commands. Drawing on theories of performative language and magical rites, we propose that effective prompt construction functions as ritual magic through three essential elements: clear and specific language, contextual framing, and structured sequencing. In this, we show that AI is not a singular tool operation, but rather a mode of forming a mutual cybernetic relationship. Through case studies from the AI Anthropology Toolkit, we show how skilled practitioners harness the “magical” capabilities of LLMs for analytical insights through careful prompt engineering. We then examine implications for business anthropologists working in organizational settings, exploring how this cybernetic relationship enables distributed agency and co-becoming between human expertise and computational pattern recognition. This perspective provides both a theoretical contribution to understanding human-AI interaction and practical guidance for anthropological practice in an era of increasingly sophisticated AI collaboration.
References
Artz, M. (2023). “Ten Predictions for AI and the Future of Anthropology.” Anthropology News 64(2): 15-17. https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/ten-predictions-for-ai-and-the-future-of-anthropology/
Artz, M. (2025). “AI Anthropology Toolkit.” Software. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16728812
Artz, M. (2026a). “A Call for an AI Anthropology.” General Anthropology 33: 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/gena.70007
Artz, M. (2026b). “Co-Becoming with AI: An Anthropological Framework for Equitable Human-AI Systems.” In L. Koycheva, A. K. VandenBroek, and M. Artz (eds.), Anthropology and AI (pp. 45-65). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003532750-4
Artz, M. (2026c). “Multi-Agent Ethnography: Post-Conventional Anthropological Practice Through Human-AI Collaboration.” Anthropological Forum. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2026.2614501
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
Campolo, A. and Crawford, K. (2020). “Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.277
Dell’Acqua, F., Ayoubi, C., Lifshitz, H., Sadun, R., Mollick, E., Mollick, L., Han, Y., Goldman, J., Nair, H., Taub, S., and Lakhani, K. R. (2025). The Cybernetic Teammate: A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise. Working Paper No. w33641. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33641
Engelke, M. (2019). How to Think Like an Anthropologist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/9781400889525
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gell, A. (1992). “The Technology of Enchantment.” In Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics (pp. 40-63). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198277330.003.0003
Gell, A. (1999). The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams. Oxford: Berg.
Haraway, D. (1988). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14(3): 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Haraway, D. (2007). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hill, K. and Freedman, D. (2025). “Chatbots Can Go Into a Delusional Spiral. Here’s How It Happens.” The New York Times (August 8).
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055
Latour, B. (2010). On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393269
Malefyt, T. d. W. (2021). “Magical Practice.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.463
Malefyt, T. d. W. (2023). “Capitalism’s ‘Magic Act’.” Anthropology News. https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/capitalisms-magic-act/
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mauss, M. (1972). A General Theory of Magic. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
McGrath, L. S. (2026). “Partners in Conversation.” In L. Koycheva, A. K. VandenBroek, and M. Artz (eds.), Anthropology and AI (pp. 177-198). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003532750-10
Moeran, B. (2015). The Magic of Fashion: Ritual, Commodity, Glamour. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Moeran, B. and Malefyt, T. d. W. (2018). Magical Capitalism: Enchantment, Spells, and Occult Practices in Contemporary Economies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74397-4
Salisbury, E. (2020). “Magic, Religion, and Science: A Special Issue.” Accessus 6(2): Article 1. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/accessus/vol6/iss2/1
Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tambiah, S. (1968). “The Magical Power of Words.” Man (n.s.) 3(2): 175-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/2798500
Taussig, M. (2003). “Viscerality, Faith and Scepticism.” In B. Meyer and P. Pels (eds.), Magic and Modernity (pp. 272-306). Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620056-013
Tiku, N. (2022). “Google Fired Engineer Who Said Its AI Was Sentient.” The Washington Post (July 22). https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/22/google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine-fired/
Vangkilde, K. T. (2015). “Possessed by the Zeitgeist: Inspiration and Prophecy in the Business of Fashion.” Journal of Business Anthropology 4(2): 178-200. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v4i2.4890
Vangkilde, K. T. (2018). “The Business of Inspiration: A Magical Technology of Prefiguration.” In B. Moeran and T. d. W. Malefyt (eds.), Magical Capitalism: Enchantment, Spells, and Occult Practices in Contemporary Economies (pp. 191-213). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74397-4_8
Weiner, A. (1983). “From Words to Objects to Magic: Hard Words and the Boundaries of Social Interaction.” Man (n.s.) 18(4): 690-709. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801903
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wiener, N. (1950). The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Timothy de Waal Malefyt, Matt Artz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
