With AI, It Seems a Fact: Things Act Back

Authors

  • Kasper Tang Vangkilde Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen
  • Samantha Dawn Breslin Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen
  • Simon Lex Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v15i1.7830

Abstract

This editorial opens the Spring issue of the Journal of Business Anthropology. The issue consists of a collection of nine themed essays on artificial intelligence (AI) and business anthropology, edited by Matt Artz and Adam Gamwell, who have also written an introduction to the collection. In this editorial, we do not, therefore, summarize each essay and the insights of the collection, as we would usually do. For such a summary, please read the introduction by Artz and Gamwell. Instead, we offer a few thoughts on one of the core themes that runs through all the essays and, more generally, seems to be a defining feature of AI: namely, that AI appears to have finally made it an indisputable fact that things act back, being responsive in and through their relations and interactions with humans – an issue that has been explored and discussed extensively among anthropologists and other social and human scientists in the recent decades. 

References

Artz, M. and Gamwell, A. (2026). “AI and Business Anthropology: Introduction to the Themed Essays.” Journal of Business Anthropology 15(1): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v15i1.7807

Bird-David, N. (1999). “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology.” Current Anthropology 40(Supplement): 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1086/200061

Elkins, J. (1996). The Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing. San Diego, New York, and London: Harcourt, Inc.

Hallowell, A. I. (2002 [1960]). “Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior, and World View.” In G. Harvey (ed.), Readings in Indigenous Religions (pp. 17-49). London and New York: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.7312/diam92410-005

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London and New York: Routledge.

Malefyt, T. d. W. and Artz, M. (2026). “The Magical Power of Words in Large Language Models.” Journal of Business Anthropology 15(1): 95-114. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v15i1.7813

Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418

VandenBroek, A. K., Artz, M., and Koycheva, L. (2026). “Introduction: An Anthropological History of AI.” In L. Koycheva, A. K. Vanden-Broek, and M. Artz (eds.), Anthropology and AI (pp. 1-24). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003532750-1

Vangkilde, K. T. (2012). Branding HUGO BOSS: An Anthropology of Creativity in Fashion. Ph.D. Series no. 70. University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Anthropology.

Vangkilde, K. T. (2015). “Possessed by the Zeitgeist: Inspiration and Prophecy in the Business of Fashion.” Journal of Business Anthropology 4(2): 178-200. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v4i2.4890

Vangkilde, K. T. (2017). ”Foretelling the Future: The Fashion Designer as Shaman.” Anthropology Today 33(2): 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12336

Vangkilde, K. T. (2018). “The Business of Inspiration: A Magical Technology of Prefiguration.” In B. Moeran and T. d. W. Malefyt (eds.), Magical Capitalism: Enchantment, Spells, and Occult Practices in Contemporary Economies (pp. 191-213). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74397-4_8

Downloads

Published

2026-08-04

Issue

Section

Editorial