Parrhesia and the ethics of public service – towards a genealogy of the bureaucrat as frank counsellor

Authors

  • Edward Barratt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v1i28.6076

Abstract

Foucault makes clear in his later lectures that the notion of parrhesia has a long and varied history, which he merely sketches in his investigations of ancient politics and philosophy. Recent research extends and modifies Foucault’s genealogy of parrhesia as an aspect of the practice of the adviser or counsellor of a monarch or prince, showing how parrhesia informed notions of counsel at other times: in later antiquity, the middle ages as well as early modern Europe. Here we seek to show that the ancient notion of parrhesia reappears as a graft in another domain of modern truth telling: that of bureaucracy in Britain, in the debates over the organisation of the offices of government, with the middle years of the nineteenth century a decisive moment of rupture. We consider the fate of bureaucratic frank counsel in our own era. Interpreters of Foucault’s later lectures on governmentality have analysed the consequences of neoliberal rule for the government of public servants during the era of Margaret Thatcher. Presenting a reappraisal of the era, we show how important counter-discourses also emerged in this era, bringing the ethics of office to the fore, as civil servants argued for the formal codification of bureaucratic ethics, including frank counsel, as they tried to defend their professional ethics. Our discussion therefore addresses a key, early moment in the emergence of the ideal of codifying frank counsel and bureaucratic ethics. We consider the consequences of codification, arguing that a deep ambivalence now characterises the way in which political authorities seek to govern this domain of ethical practice.

Author Biography

Edward Barratt

Edward Barratt has written extensively about the later work of Michel Foucault in the field of organization and management studies. His current research interests concern the histories of management and ethical codification in the British Civil Service and the history of the concept of stake-holding, especially in the early years of ‘New Labour’ in Britain.

References

Achilleos, Stella, ‘Friendship and good counsel: the discourses of friendship and parrhesia in Francis Bacon’s The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall,’ in Friendship in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Age: Explorations of a Fundamental Ethical Discourse, eds. Albrecht Classen and Marilyn Sandidge, 643-74. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010.

Aucoin, Peter, “New political governance in Westminster systems,” Governance 25:2 (2012), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01569.x

Bacon, Francis, Of Counsel [1597]. Charleston, South Carolina: BiblioBazaar, 2010.

Bacon, Robert, and Walter Eltis, Britain’s Economic Problem: Too few producers. London: Macmillan, 1978.

Bakvis, Herman, and Mark Jarvis, From New Public Management to New Political Governance: Essays in Honour of Peter Aucoin. Montreal: McGill Queens Press, 2012.

Barratt, Edward, “Governing public servants,” Management and Organizational History 4:1 (2009), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935908098859

Barratt, Edward, “Speaking frankly,” Management and Organizational History 14:3 (2019), 294-310. doi/abs/10.1080/17449359.2019.1698439

Barry, Andrew, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, “Introduction,” in Foucault and Politi-cal Reason, eds. Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne and Nikolas Rose, 1-19. Chicago: Chi-cago University Press, 1996.

Bridges, Sir Edward, “The reforms of 1854 in retrospect,” Political Quarterly 25:4 (1954), 316-323. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1954.tb01766.x

Brown, Peter, Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992.

Brown, Gordon, “Constitutional reform statement” [2007], in The Change We Choose, 159-182. London: Mainstream, 2010.

Cameron, David, Speech at Conservative Spring Forum. Cardiff, March, 2011.

Chapman, Richard, and J. R. Greenaway, The Dynamics of Administrative Reform. London: Croom Helm, 1980.

Chapman, Richard, and Barry O’Toole, “The role of the Civil Service: a traditional view in a period of change,” Public Policy and Administration 10:2 (1995), 3–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000202

Colclough, David, Freedom of Speech in early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: On the Constitu-tion of Church and State [1839]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.

Condren, Conel, Argument and Authority in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press, 2006.

Conservative Central Office, Conservative Manifesto [1979]. Margaret Thatcher Foundation, 2020. https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/110858.

Dean, Mitchell, “Foucault, Ewald, Neoliberalism and the Left,” in Foucault and Neoliberalism, eds. Daniel Zamora and Michael Behrent, 85-114. Cambridge: Polity, 2016.

Diamond, Patrick, The End of Whitehall. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2018.

Du Gay, Paul, “In defence of mandarins: Recovering the ‘core business’ of public manage-ment,” Management & Organizational History 4:4 (2009), 359-384, https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935909342326

Elyot, Thomas, The Boke Named the Governor [1531]. Cambridge: ProQuest EEBO Edition, 2010.

Erasmus, Desiderius, The Education of a Christian Prince [1516]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Ferlie, Ewan, and McGivern, Gerry, “Bringing Anglo-governmentality into public administration scholarship,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24:1, (2014), 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut002

Foster, Christopher, British Government in Crisis. London: Bloomsbury, 2005.

Foucault, Michel, Fearless Speech. New York: Semiotext(e), 2001.

Foucault, Michel, Society Must Be Defended [1997]. New York: Picador, 2003.

Foucault, Michel, The Hermeneutics of the Subject [2001]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2005.

Foucault, Michel, “What is critique?” [1978], in What is Enlightenment?, ed. J. Schmidt, 382-399. Berkley: University of California Press, 1996.

Foucault, Michel, Society, Territory, Population [2004]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2007.

Foucault, Michel, The Birth of Biopolitics [2004]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2008.

Foucault, Michel, The Courage of Truth [2008]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2011.

Foucault, Michel, The Government of Self and Others [2008]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2010.

First Division Association, Memorandum submitted to the Treasury and Civil Service Committee: “Civil servants’ duties and responsibilities”, in Seventh Report of the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee Session 1985-6, HC 92- 11. London: HMSO, 1986.

Fry, Geoffrey, “The development of the Thatcher government’s grand strategy for the Civil Service,” Public Administration 62:3 (1984), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1984.tb00566.x

Gane, Nicholas, “The emergence of neoliberalism,” Theory, Culture and Society 31:4 (2014), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413506944

Gordon, Colin, “Governmentality and the genealogy of politics,” Education and Research 39:4, (2013), 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022013000400015

Gowan, Peter, “The origins of the administrative elite,” New Left Review 162 (March/April 1987), 4-34.

Green, Ewen H. H., Ideologies of Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Guy, John, “The rhetoric of counsel in early modern England,” in Tudor Political Culture, ed. Dale Hoak, 292-310. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Haldane, Richard, “An organized Civil Service,” Public Administration 1:1 (1923), 6-16, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1923.tb02131.x

Jenkins, Kate, Karen Caines, and Andrew Jackson, Improving Management in Government: The Next Steps. London: Stationery Office, 1988.

Joyce, Patrick, The State of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Jowett, Benjamin, “Introduction” [1871], in Plato, Charmides, 3-28. London: Good Press, 2019.

Lowe, Rodney, The Official History of the British Civil Service. London: Routledge, 2011.

Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince [1513]. London: Wordsworth Editions, 1993.

Marquand, David, The Decline of the Public: The Hollowing Out of Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity.

Maude, Francis, Speech at Civil Service World Conference. November, 2009a.

Maude, Francis, Conference Speech. Manchester, October, 2009b.

More, Thomas, Utopia [1515]. London: Penguin, 2012.

Niskanen, William, Bureaucracy: Servant or Master. London: IEA, 1971.

O’Malley, Pat, Lorna Weir, and Clifford Shearing, “Governmentality, criticism, politics,” Economy and Society 26:4 (1997), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000026

Osborne, Thomas, “Bureaucracy as a vocation”, Journal of Historical Sociology 7:3 (1994), 289-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.1994.tb00067.x

O’Toole, Barry, The Ideal of Public Service. Routledge, London, 2006.

Parliamentary Papers (PP), Report on the Organization of the Permanent Civil Service IX. Lon-don: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1854. https://www.civilservant.org.uk/library/1854_Northcote_Trevelyan_Report.pdf.

Paul, Joanne, “Serving the public by advising the ruler,” in The European Public Servant, eds. Fritz Sagar and Patrick Overeem, 37-52. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2015.

Paul, Joanne, Counsel and Command in early Modern English Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020

Perkin, Harold, The Origins of Modern English Society [1969]. London: Routledge, 2002.

Pilkington, Colin, The Civil Service in Britain Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.

Plowden, William, “What Prospects for the Civil Service?,” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 133:5348 (1985), 526-543. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41373997.

Ponting, Clive, The Right to Know. London: Sphere, 1985.

Ponting, Clive, Whitehall Tragedy and Farce. London: Sphere, 1986.

Prime Minister, The Civil Service Continuity and Change, CM 2627. London: Stationery Of-fice, 1994. https://www.civilservant.org.uk/library/1994_continuity_and_change.pdf.

Rapp, Claudia, Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity: The Nature of Christian Leadership in the Age of Transition. Berkeley: University of California, 2013.

Rhodes, Roderick L., John Wanna, and Patrcik Weller, Comparing Westminster. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press, 2009.

Rose, Nikolas, Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Rose, Jacqueline, “The problem of political counsel,” in The Politics of Counsel in England and Wales 1286-1707, ed. Jacqueline Rose, 1-43. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought Volume One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Stanley, Arthur P., Stanley’s Life of Arnold [1840]. London: John Murray, 1895.

Stopper, M.R., “Greek philosophy and the Victorians,” Phronesis 26:3 (1981), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852881X00042.

Thatcher, Margaret, The Downing Street Years. London: Harper Collins, 1993.

Tomlin, Lord, Royal Commission on the Civil Service 1929-1931, CMD. 3909. London: Sta-tionery Office, 1931.

Triantafillou, Peter, Neoliberal Power and Public Management Reforms. Manchester: Manches-ter University Press, 2017.

Turner, Frank M., The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.

Van Renswoude, Irene, The Rhetoric of Free Speech in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Vance, Norman, The Sinews of the Spirit: the ideal of Christian manliness in Victorian literature and religious thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Vincent, David, The Culture of Secrecy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Wass, Douglas, Government and Governed. London: Routledge, 1983b.

Wass, Douglas, “The public service in modern society,” Public Administration 61:1 (1983b), 7-20.

Winn, William, “Tom Brown’s schooldays and the development of ‘muscular Christianity,” Church History 29:11 (1960), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3161617.

Young, Hugo, and Anne Sloman, No Minister. London: BBC, 1982.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-27

How to Cite

Barratt, E. (2020). Parrhesia and the ethics of public service – towards a genealogy of the bureaucrat as frank counsellor. Foucault Studies, (28), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v1i28.6076

Issue

Section

Articles