Feminism, Foucault, and the Critique of Reason: Re-reading the <i>History of Madness</i>
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i16.4115Resumé
This paper situates Lynne Huffer’s recent queer-feminist Foucaultian critique of reason within the context of earlier feminist debates about reason and critically assesses Huffer’s work from the point of view of its faithfulness to Foucault’s work and its implications for feminism. I argue that Huffer’s characterization of Enlightenment reason as despotic not only departs from Foucault’s account of the relationship between power and reason, it also leaves her stuck in the same double binds that plagued earlier feminist critiques of reason. An appreciation of the profoundly ambivalent nature of Foucault’s critique of reason offers feminists some insights into how to navigate those double binds. What feminists should learn from the early Foucault is precisely his commitment to engage in a rational critique of reason that highlights reason’s dangerous entanglements with power while resisting the temptation to reject or refuse reason altogether.Downloads
Publiceret
2013-08-22
Citation/Eksport
Allen, A. (2013). Feminism, Foucault, and the Critique of Reason: Re-reading the <i>History of Madness</i>. Foucault Studies, (16), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i16.4115
Nummer
Sektion
Special Issue on Foucault and Feminism
Licens
Authors retain copyright to their work, but assign the right of the first publication to Foucault Studies. The work is subject to a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, but despite these restrictions, authors can take for granted that Foucault Studies will permit articles published in Foucault Studies to be translated or reprinted in another format such as a book providing a full reference is made to Foucault Studies as the original place of publication.