Sustaining Significance of Confessional Form: Taking Foucault to Attitudinal Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.i34.6932Schlagworte:
Foucault, Confession, subjectivation, surveying, coding behaviourAbstract
This paper offers a conceptual reconstruction and empirical case study of an often-eclipsed concept of Michel Foucault’s genealogical project, confession. Departing from Foucault’s dictum that his core research interest rests in the experience of the subject, I argue that, without a detailed understanding of diverse modalities of the confessional form, various subjectivation processes and epistemological procedures could not be fully grasped. In the first part, I systematise Foucault’s incoherent confessional account against the backdrop of his entangled genealogies of modern man and the human sciences. Subsequently, I introduce a case study of a quantitative attitudinal survey based on face-to-face interviews to test Foucault’s model of confession in present-day circumstances and demonstrate its sustaining analytical significance by disclosing the cognitive technique of coding behaviour. Thus far, governmentality studies have confronted positivistic methods in social sciences to display their objectifying functions. In contrast, I use the technique of coding behaviour to immerse into these scientific practices. Such a perspective delivers a fine-grained exposure of epistemological strategies in social sciences that are enabled by the appropriation of the confessional model and that constitute subjective identities on an individual and mass scale.
Literaturhinweise
Atkinson, Paul, and David Silverman, “Kundera’s Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of the Self,” Qualitative Inquiry 3:3 (1997), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300304
Barker, Christopher, “How to tell the political truth: Foucault on new combinations of the basic modes of veridiction,” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (2019), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0253-0
Büttgen, Philippe, “Foucault’s Concept of Confession,” Foucault Studies 29 (2021), 6-21.
Colombo, Agustín, “What Is a Desiring Man?,” Foucault Studies 29 (2021), 71-90.
Converse, Philip Ernest, “Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in The Qualitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. Edward Tufte, 168-189. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1970.
Crano, William, Prislin, Radmila, eds. Attitudes and Attitude Change. New York: Psychology Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838068
Dean, Mitchell, Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE, 2010.
Dreyfus, Hubert Lederer, and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983.
Elden, Stuart, “The Problem of Confession: The Productive Failure of Foucault’s History of Sexuality,” Journal for Cultural Research 9:1 (2005), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479758042000331925
Elden, Stuart, Foucault’s Last Decade. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
Foucault, Michel, “The Confession of the Flesh,” in Power/Knowledge, ed. Colin Gordon, 194-229. New York: Vintage Books, 1980.
Foucault, Michel, “The Subject and Power,” Critical Inquiry 9:4 (1982), 777-795.
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume III: The Care of the Self. New York: Panthe-on Books, 1986.
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume II: The Use of Pleasure. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.
Foucault, Michel, “Politics and Reason,” in Politics, Philosophy, Culture, ed. Lawrence Kritzman, 57-86. New York: Routledge, 1990b.
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books, 1991.
Foucault, Michel, “Technologies of the Self,” in The Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, ed. Paul Rabinow, 223-253. London: Penguin Books, 1997.
Foucault, Michel, Abnormal. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Foucault, Michel, Order of Things. Oxfordshire: Francis and Taylor, 2005.
Foucault, Michel, The Hermeneutics of the Subject. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
Foucault, Michel, “Subjectivity and Truth,” in The Politics of Truth, ed. Sylvère Lotringer, 147-169. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2007.
Foucault, Michel, The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Foucault, Michel, The Government of Self and Others. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Foucault, Michel, The Courage of Truth. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Foucault, Michel, On the Government of the Living. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Foucault, Michel, Wrong-Doing, Truth-Telling. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014b.
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume IV: Confessions of the Flesh. New York: Pan-theon Books, 2021.
Fowler, Floyd Jackson, and Charles Cannell, “Using Behavioural Coding to Identify Cogni-tive Problems with Survey Questions,” Answering Questions. Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research, ed. Norbert Schwarz and Sey-mur Sudman, 15-36. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
Hacking, Ian, “Biopower and the Avalanche of Printed Numbers,” Humanities in Society 5:3-4 (1982), 279-295.
Hacking, Ian, “How should We Do the History of Statistics?,” in The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, ed. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 181-195. Chi-cago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
Harcourt, Bernard E., “Foucault’s Keystone: Confessions of the Flesh,” Foucault Studies 29 (2021), 48-70.
Jay, Martin, “In the Empire of the Gaze,” in Foucault. A Critical Reader, ed. David Couzens Hoy, 175-204. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Kelly, Mark, The Political Philosophy of Michel Foucault. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Konoval, Brandon, “From Sexuality to Governmentality,” Modern Intellectual History 16:1 (2019), 217-249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244317000038
Miller, Peter and Nikolas Rose, Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
O’Leary, Timothy, Foucault and the Art of Ethics. London: Continuum, 2002.
Osborne, Thomas, and Nikolas Rose, “Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena?,” British Journal of Sociology 50: 3 (1999), 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00367.x
Rose, Nikolas, Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2004.
Röschová, Michaela, České panelové šetření domácností. Praha: IS, CAS, 2015.
Schwarz, Norbert, Hippler, Hans, and Elizabeth Noell-Neumann, Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
Schwarz, Norbert, and Seymur Sudman, Answering Questions. Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub-lisher, 1996.
SOÚ AV ČR, v.v.i., CERGE-EI, FSS MU. “Czech Households Panel Survey (2015-2018). First Wave. The Coding Behavior,” electronic dataset (2017), Prague: Český so-ciálněvědní datový archiv, http://nesstar.soc.cas.cz/webview/, (accessed October 12, 2020).
Taylor, Chloë, The Culture of Confession from Augustine to Foucault: A Genealogy of the 'Con-fessing Animal'. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Tourangeau, Roger, “Context Effects on Responses to Attitude Questions: Attitudes as Memory Structures,” in Effects in Social and Psychological Research, ed. Norbert Schwarz, Hans Hippler, and Elizabeth Noell-Neumann, 35-49. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
Vargas, Patrick, T., Sekaquaptewa, Denise, William von Hippel, “Armed Only with Paper and Pencil,” in Implicit Measures of Attitudes, ed. Bernd Wittenbrink and Norbert Schwarz. New York: Guilford Publications, 2007.
Vinopal, Jiří, Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: The Method of Immediate Validation. Prague: Institute of Sociology, 2008.
Weberman, David, “Are Freedom and Anti-Humanism Compatible?,” Constellations 7:2 (2000), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00185
Wittenbrink, Bernd, and Norbert Schwarz, Implicit Measures of Attitudes. New York: Guilford Publications, 2007.
Zaller, John, and Stanley Feldman, “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response,” American Journal of Political Science 36:3 (1992), 579-616.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright to their work, but assign the right of the first publication to Foucault Studies. The work is subject to a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, but despite these restrictions, authors can take for granted that Foucault Studies will permit articles published in Foucault Studies to be translated or reprinted in another format such as a book providing a full reference is made to Foucault Studies as the original place of publication.