A Critique of Pandemic Reason: Towards a Syndemic Noso-Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.i35.7087Schlagworte:
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, noso-politics, Pandemic, Evolution, SyndemicAbstract
The main objective of this article is to provide a critique of the pandemic strategy suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO) and implemented by various countries from March 2020 onwards in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Based on the theories of Michel Foucault, this critique aims to show that, in the first instance, the pandemic may be understood in terms of the art of governing human beings at the point of interaction between politics and medicine; secondly, in Foucauldian terminology, such interaction may be referred to as ‘noso-politics’, that is, a mechanism used to control the body of the population via authoritarian measures exercised in the name of the health of the population; thirdly, such a mechanism exercises its power by invoking a mechanistic truth about the SARS-CoV-2 virus which may be countered by an argument that takes a historical perspective on the virus; fourthly, the pandemic strategy may be opposed by a syndemic approach that takes into account interactions between emerging diseases such as COVID-19 and non-communicable illnesses, as well as the biological and socio-economic conditions that the well-being of the population depends on. In short, by providing a critique of the politics of truth about the pandemic, the virus, and health measures, the article aims to encourage a critical attitude that will challenge both the authorities and the truth they invoke to prevent the pandemic strategy being used as a mechanism for governing, given the predictions of the recurrent emergence of new viruses.Literaturhinweise
Agamben, Giorgio, “The invention of an epidemic,” European Journal of Psychoanalysis. https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/articles/coronavirus-and-philosophers/ (ac-cessed November 10, 2023).
Agamben, Giorgio, “Il diritto e la vita,” Quodlibet. https://www.quodlibet.it/letture/giorgio-agamben-il-diritto-e-la-vita (accessed November 10, 2023).
Christaens, Tim, ”Must Society be Defended from Agamben?,” Critical Legal Thinking. Law and the Political. https://criticallegalthinking.com/2020/03/26/must-society-be-defended-from-agamben/ (accessed November 10, 2023).
Constantinou, Costas S., “Responses to COVID-19 as a form of ‘biopower’,” International Review of Sociology 32:1 (2022), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.2000069.
Couch, Danielle L, Priscilla Robinson, and Paul A Komesaroff, “COVID-19-Extending sur-veillance and the panopticon,” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17:4 (2020), 809-814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10036-5de
Desjardins, E. “Historicity in biology”, PhD diss., University of British Columbia, 2009.
Dutta, Abishek, “COVID-19 waves: Variant dynamics and control,” Scientific Reports 12:1 (2022), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13371-2
Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978, trans. Graham Burchell, ed. Michel Senellart. New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009.
Foucault, Michel, History of Madness, trans. Jonathan Murphy and Jean Khalfa, ed. Jean Khalfa. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.
Foucault, Michel, “’Omnes et singulatim’: Toward a Critique of Political Reason” [1979], in Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, trans. Robert Hurley and Others, ed. James D. Faubion, 298-325. New York: The New Press, 2001.
Foucault, Michel, “What Is Critique?” [1978], in What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, trans. Kevin Paul Geiman, ed. James Schmidt, 382-398. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
Foucault, Michel, “The Politics of Health in the Eighteenth Century” [1976], in The Foucault Reader, trans. Colin Gordon, ed. Paul Rabinow, 273-289. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984.
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
Glitsos, Laura, “COVID-19 and the ‘perfectly governed city’,” Journal for Cultural Research 25:12 (2021), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2021.1943816
Horton, Richard, “COVID-19 is not a pandemic,” The Lancet 396 :10255 (2020), 874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32000-6
Kenyon, Chris, “Syndemic responses to COVID-19 should include an ecological dimen-sion,” The Lancet 396:10264 (2020), 1730-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32219-4
Lecoq, Herve, “Discovery of the first virus, the tobacco mosaic virus: 1892 or 1898?,” Comptes rendus de l’Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie 324:10 (2001), 929-933. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0764-4469(01)01368-3
Liangsheng Zhang, Fu-ming Shen, Fei Chen, and Zhenguo Lin, “Origin and Evolution of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 71:15 (2020), 882–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa112
Lewontin, Richard and Richard Levins, “Chance and necessity,” Capitalism Nature Socialism 8:1 (1997), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759709358722
Mendenhall, Emily, “The COVID-19 syndemic is not global: context matters,” The Lancet 396:10264 (2020), 1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32218-2
Nancy, Jean-Luc, “A Viral Exception,” in Coronavirus, Psychoanalysis, and Philosophy, ed. Fernando Castrillón and Thomas Marchevsky, 27. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.
Plato, “Protagoras,” in Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus, trans. W. R. M. Lamb, ed. T. E. Page, 85-258. Great Britain: Harvard University Press, 1952.
Saha, Senjuti, Arif Mohammad Tanmoy, Afroza Akter Tanni, Sharmistha Goswami, Syed Muktadir Al Sium, Sudipta Saha, Shuborno Islam, Yogesh Hooda, Apurba Rajib Ma-laker, Ataul Mustufa Anik, Md Saidul Haq, Tasnim Jabin, Md Mobarok Hossain, Nazi-fa Tabassum, Hafizur Rahman, Md Jibon Hossain, Mohammad Shahidul Islam, and Samir K. Saha, “New waves, new variants, old inequity: a continuing COVID-19 crisis,” BMJ Global Health 6:8 (2021), e007031. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007031
Sarasin, Philipp, “Understanding the Coronavirus Pandemic with Foucault?,” Genealo-gy+Critique. https://blog.genealogy-critique.net/essays/254/understanding-corona-with-foucault#abscit (accessed November 10, 2023).
Steytler, Nico, Comparative Federalism and Covid-19: Combating the Pandemic. London: Routledge, 2022.
Sun, Yamine, Wenchao Lin, Wei Dong and Jianguo Xu, “Origin and evolutionary analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant,” Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity 4:1 (2022), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2021.12.001
Tyrrell David and Bynoe Mark, “Cultivation of viruses from a high proportion of patients with colds,” The Lancet 287:7428 (1966), 76–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(66)92364-6
van den Berge, Lukas, “Biopolitics and the Coronavirus: Foucault, Agamben, Žižek,” Neth-erlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 1:49 (2020), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/.000097
Wit, Emmie de, Friederike Feldmann, Eva Horne, Cynthia Martellaro, Elaine Haddock, Trenton Bushmaker, Kyle Rosenke, Atsushi Okumura, Rebecca Rosenke, Greg Saturday, Dana Scott and Heinz Feldmann, “Domestic Pig Unlikely Reservoir for MERS-CoV,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 23:6 (2017), 985-988. https://doi.org/10.3201%2Feid2306.170096
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright to their work, but assign the right of the first publication to Foucault Studies. The work is subject to a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, but despite these restrictions, authors can take for granted that Foucault Studies will permit articles published in Foucault Studies to be translated or reprinted in another format such as a book providing a full reference is made to Foucault Studies as the original place of publication.
