Militær ledelse: Kunst, håndværk eller videnskab?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v35i1.5919Nøgleord:
Militær ledelse, metaforer, professionsudvikling, ledelsesudvikling, kunst, håndværk, videnskabResumé
Er militær ledelse en kunst? Et håndværk? Eller en videnskab? Med afsæt i en analyse af begrebet militær ledelse viser artiklen, hvordan arbejdet med metaforer har en helt central organisatorisk funktion og kan udgøre et væsentligt redskab til udvikling af organisationer og professioner. Artiklen præsenterer dels en teoretisk udfoldelse af og refleksion over, hvad vi kan få blik for, hvis vi betragter metaforer som et perspektiv. Dels undersøger artiklen konkret, hvordan tre forskellige metaforiske forståelser af militær ledelse – som henholdsvis en kunst, et håndværk eller en videnskab – har afgørende betydning for, hvordan den militære organisation vurderer og udvikler sine militære ledere.
Referencer
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (Red.). (2011). Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world. Routledge.
Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2007). The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander, and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch’s letters to stockholders of General Electric. Human Relations, 60(12), 1839–1872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707084916
Andriessen, D., & Gubbins, C. (2009). Metaphor Analysis as an Approach for Exploring Theoretical Concepts: The Case of Social Capital. Organization Studies, 30(8), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609334952
Arnfred, C. E. (2013, september 28). Hækkerup: Illoyale oberst Hachel-typer skader forsvaret. Berlingske. Hentet fra https://www.b.dk/content/item/485491
Atkinson, C. J. (2003). The Nature and Role of Generative Systemic Metaphor within Information Systems Planning and Development. I E. H. Wynn, E. A. Whitley, M. D. Myers, & J. I. DeGross (Red.), Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology (Bd. 110, s. 323–343). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35634-1_16
Barfod, J. R. (2017). Hvad er militær ledelse? Hentet fra http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Pages/Hvadermiltarledelse.aspx
Barrett, F. J., & Cooperrider, D. L. (1990). Generative Metaphor Intervention: A New Approach for Working with Systems Divided by Conflict and Caught in Defensive Perception. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886390262011
Bévort, F. (2017). Professionalisering af ledelse i spændingsfeltet mellem bureaukrati og profession. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 19(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.7146/tfa.v19i3.109064
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press.
Boe, O. (2015). Building Resilience: The Role of Character Strengths in the Selection and Education of Military Leaders. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.4172/1522-4821.1000301
Boe, O., & Bang, H. (2016). The Big 12: The Most Important Character Strengths for Military Officers. ATINER’S Conference Paper Serie, PSY2016.
Borre, M. (2014, april 10). EL: Nu kan skandalerne i forsvaret fortsætte. Politiken. Hentet fra https://politiken.dk/indland/politik/art5510715/EL-Nu-kan-skandalerne-i-forsvaret-forts%C3%A6tte
Bousquet, A. (2009). The scientific way of warfare: Order and chaos on the battlefields of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Boxenbaum, E., & Rouleau, L. (2011). New Knowledge Products As Bricolage: Metaphors and Scripts in Organizational Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330898
Burke, K. (1945). A Grammar of Motives. Hentet fra https://books.google.dk/books?id=kl0NAQAAIAAJ
Calhoun, M. T. (2011). Clausewitz and Jomini: Contrasting Intellectual Frameworks in Military Theory. Army History, (80), 22–37. Hentet fra JSTOR.
Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2016). Women face a labyrinth: An examination of metaphors for women leaders. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31(8), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2015-0007
Carvalho, T. (2012). Managerialism and professional strategies: A case from nurses in Portugal. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211251562
Clemmesen, M. H. (2015). Fortsættelse. Videregående officersuddannelse: Del 3—Afprofessionaliseringen. Krigsvidenskab.dk online. Hentet fra http://www.krigsvidenskab.dk/videregaaende-officersuddannelse-del-3-afprofessionaliseringen
Cornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond Compare: Metaphor in Organization Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159166
Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. (2008). The Emergent Organization: Primary and Complex Metaphors in Theorizing about Organizations. Organization Studies, 29(7), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608090533
Cornelissen, J. P., Kafouros, M., & Lock, A. R. (2005). Metaphorical images of organization: How organizational researchers develop and select organizational metaphors. Human Relations, 58(12), 1545–1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705061317
Cornelissen, J. P., Oswick, C., Christensen, L. T., & Phillips, N. (2008). Metaphor in Organizational Research: Context, Modalities and Implications for Research — Introduction. Organization Studies, 29(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607086634
Forrester, G. (2000). Professional autonomy versus managerial control: The experience of teachers in an english primary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 10(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210000200056
Gregor, W. J. (2010). Military Planning Systems and Stability Operations. PRISM, 1(3), 99–114. Hentet fra JSTOR.
Greve, L. (2016). Using metaphor as a management tool. I The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (s. 400–412). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672953.ch27
Hagedorn-Rasmussen, P., Krause-Jensen, J., & Mogensen, M. (2017). Ledelse som profession—Mellem idé og praksis. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 19(3), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.7146/tfa.v19i3.109062
Hald, C., & Rønn, K. V. (2013). Om at opdage: Metodiske refleksioner over politiets undersøgelsespraksis. Frederiksberg C: Samfundslitteratur.
Heltberg, T., & Jellesmark, T. (2017). What Difference Does a Difference Make? Considerations About Lessons Learned from Difficult Operational Situations. I M. Holenweger, M. K. Jager, & F. Kernic (Red.), Leadership in Extreme Situations (s. 295–321). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55059-6
Heracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2008). Understanding Organizations through Embodied Metaphors. Organization Studies, 29(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607086637
Holsting, V. S. (2017). Militært chefvirke: Kritik og retfærdiggørelse mellem politik og profession. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School [Phd], 2017.
Hovedorganisationen af Officerer i Danmark. (2017). Forsvarsforlig i et officersperspektiv (s. 44).
Jacobs, C. D., & Heracleous, L. Th. (2006). Constructing Shared Understanding: The Role of Embodied Metaphors in Organization Development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305284895
Jermier, J. M., & Forbes, L. C. (2011). Metaphor as the Foundation of Organizational Studies: Images of Organization and Beyond. Organization & Environment, 24(4), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026611436328
Kemp, L. J. (2016). ‘Trapped’ by metaphors for organizations: Thinking and seeing women’s equality and inequality. Human Relations, 69(4), 975–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715621612
Kendall, J. E., & Kendall, K. E. (1993). Metaphors and Methodologies: Living beyond the Systems Machine. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/249799
Kirkpatrick, I., & Ackroyd, S. (2003). Archetype Theory and the Changing Professional Organization: A Critique and Alternative. Organization, 10(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084030104005
Knudsen, H., Olesen, K. G., Bojesen, A., & Gleerup, J. (2014). Ledelse og velfærdsprofessioner.
Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 16(1), 5–10.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latusek, D., & Vlaar, P. W. (2015). Exploring managerial talk through metaphor: An opportunity to bridge rigour and relevance? Management Learning, 46(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507614529512
Linn, G. B., Sherman, R., & Gill, P. B. (2007). Making Meaning of Educational Leadership: The Principalship in Metaphor. NASSP Bulletin, 91(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636507302095
Lund, S. K. (2017). Udviklingen og anvendelsen af dansk forsvars landmilitære doktrin. Krigsvidenskab.dk, 10.
Lundberg, A., Artéus, G., Wijnbladh, C., & Försvarshögskolan. (1997). Vägar till svensk officersetik: Grundtext till militär etikutbildning. Stockholm: Försvarshögskolan.
Marshak, R. J. (1993). Managing the metaphors of change. Organizational Dynamics, 22(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90081-B
Mintzberg, H. (2005). Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco, Calif: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.15268779
Mintzberg, H. (2009). Managing. Hentet fra http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?bookid=31829
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publ.
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
Morgan, G. (2011). Reflections on Images of Organization and Its Implications for Organization and Environment. Organization & Environment, 24(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026611434274
Morgan, G. (2017). Foreword. I A. Örtenblad, K. Trehan, & L. L. Putnam (Red.), Exploring Morgan’s metaphors: Theory, research, and practice in organizational studies (s. xiii–xxix). Los Angeles: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506318752
Mottelson, M. (2018). Ind i pædagogikken. Kbh.: Akademisk Forlag.
Møller, H. H. (2013). Kunst på det operative niveau. Militaert Tidsskrift, 141. årgang(nr. 4), 25–41.
Nørgaard, K., & Holsting, V. S. (2014). Militær ledelse i et professionsperspektiv. Hentet fra http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Pages/Militaerledelseietprofessionsperspektiv.aspx
Nørgaard, K., Holsting, V. S., & Schultz-Larsen, S. E. (2015). Det militærfaglige råd og embedsvirke. Kbh.: Forsvarsakademiet.
Nørgaard, K., Holsting, V. S., & Thorbjørnsen, S. R. (2008). Militær etik og ledelse i praksis. København: Forsvarsakademiet.
Perreault, G. (1996). Metaphors for Leadership: Military Battle and Friendship. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199600300106
Putnam, L. L., & Boys, S. (2006). Revisiting Metaphors of Organizational Communication. I The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (s. 541–576). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n19
Rasmussen, P. E. (2018, oktober 18). Anklager om nepotisme og magtmisbrug mod generalmajor. Hentet 28. november 2018, fra OLFI website: https://olfi.dk/2018/10/18/anklager-om-nepotisme-og-magtmisbrug-mod-haerchef-og-generalmajor/ https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.47
Robl, L. (2012, februar 15). Forsvarets ledelseskultur har fatale konsekvenser. Politiken. Hentet fra https://politiken.dk/debat/art5418388/Forsvarets-ledelseskultur-har-fatale-konsekvenser
Ruth, D. (2014). Leader as priest: Plucking the fruit of a flawed metaphor. Leadership, 10(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715012467488
Schechter, C., Shaked, H., Ganon-Shilon, S., & Goldratt, M. (2016). Leadership Metaphors: School Principals’ Sense-Making of a National Reform. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1232836
Schoeneborn, D., Vásquez, C., & Cornelissen, J. (2016). Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human Relations, 69(4), 915–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715612899
Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy. I A. Ortony (Red.), Metaphor and Thought (s. 254–283). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173865.011
Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy. I A. Ortony (Red.), Metaphor and Thought (2. udg., s. 137–163). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011
Shamir, E. (2011). Transforming command: The pursuit of mission command in the U.S., British, and Israeli armies. Stanford, Calif: Stanford Security Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1144457
Smith, K. K., & Simmons, V. M. (1983). A Rumpelstiltskin Organization: Metaphors on Metaphors in Field Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392248
Spicer, A., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Metaphors for leadership. I Mats Alvesson & André Spicer (Red.), Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world (s. 31–50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.144.0264
Svendsen, J., & Bendtsen, J. V. (2016, juni 3). Soldater: Forsvaret har behov for ny ledelse. Politiken. Hentet fra https://politiken.dk/indland/art5624523/Soldater-Forsvaret-har-behov-for-ny-ledelse
Thyssen, O. (2000). Iagttagelse og blindhed: Om organisation, fornuft og utopi. Kbh.: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.
Tohidian, I., & Rahimian, H. (2019). Bringing Morgan’s metaphors in organization contexts: An essay review. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1587808
Tong, S., & Bowling, B. (2006). Art, Craft and Science of Detective Work. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 79(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2006.79.4.323
Tsoukas, H. (1991). The Missing Link: A Transformational View of Metaphors in Organizational Science. The Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279478
U.S. Department of the Army. (2014). Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 6-0: Mission Command. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada401915
Vego, M. (2012). Science vs. The Art of War. Joint Force Quarterly, 66.
Virtanen, T. (2017). Exploring Metaphors of Leadership. I A. Örtenblad, K. Trehan, & L. L. Putnam, Exploring Morgan’s Metaphors: Theory, Research, and Practice in Organizational Studies (s. 138–162). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506318752.n7
Williams, D. (2017). Forensic Vulnerability Analysis: Putting the “Art” into the Art of War. Joint Force Quarterly, 85(2nd Quarter), 36–41.
Winter, M., & Szczepanek, T. (2009). Images of projects. Farnham: Gower.
Örtenblad, A., Trehan, K., & Putnam, L. L. (Red.). (2017). Exploring Morgan’s metaphors: Theory, research, and practice in organizational studies. Los Angeles: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506318752
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatteren(ne) giver tilladelse til publicering af artiklen i det aftalte nummer. Forfatteren(ne) bevarer copyright til egne artikler.
SIS’ redaktør har ophavsretten til tidsskriftets design, navn, systematik, særpræg etc. Artikler, der er udgivet i SIS og som er fagligt godkendt af redaktionen til udgivelse, må ikke tilrettes, omredigeres, kopieres eller gengives i uddrag i andre medier uden redaktionens og forfatterens samtykke.
Artikler må ikke offentliggøres af forfatteren(ne) andetsteds uden indhentning af godkendelse fra ansvarshavende redaktør. SIS’ redaktør er dog altid forfatteren(ne) behjælpelig med at udgive artikler i særtryk samt udbrede artiklerne til andre udgivere, men kun efter aftale med forfatteren(ne) og med angivelse af, at artiklen oprindeligt blev publiceret i SIS.
