Ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellen

Betydning for ledelse af bæredygtig innovation i offentlig-private innovations-grupper

  • John Damm Scheuer
Nøgleord: Oversættelse, Ledelse, Ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellen, Innovation, Offentlig-private innovationsnetværk, Bæredygtighed, Bæredygtig omstilling, Samskabelse, Effektdrevet participatorisk design

Resumé

Denne artikel tager udgangspunkt i, at løsning af klima- og CO2-udledningskrisen kræver oversættelse og samskabelse af nye socio-tekniske løsninger i offentlig-private inno-vationsnetværk- og grupper. Den redegør for ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellens socio-tekniske forståelse af sådanne samskabelses-, design- og oversættelsesprocesser og for, hvad de ledelsesmæssige konsekvenser af den er i den forbindelse. Endelig diskuteres, hvordan processen vil kunne accelereres på den baggrund.

Forfatterbiografi

John Damm Scheuer

John Damm Scheuer er lektor, ph.d., Institut for Samfundsvidenskab og Erhverv, Roskilde Universitet

Referencer

Adil, A. M., & Ko, Y. (2016). Socio-technical evolution of Decentralized Energy Systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 57, pp. 1025–1037). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.079

Aken, V. J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies , 41(2), 219–246.

Barrett, C., Benton, T. G., Fanzo, J., Herrero, M. T., & Nelson, R. (2020). Socio-Technical Innovation Bundles for Agri-Food Systems Transformation A Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability/ Nature Sustainability Expert Panel Report. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/index.html https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x

Bednar, P. M., & Welch, C. (2020). Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1

Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002

Chilvers, J., Pallett, H., & Hargreaves, T. (2018). Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions. Energy Research and Social Science, 42, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020

Climate Change 2021 Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Summary for Policymakers. (n.d.).

Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6

Cooren, F. (2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication , 68, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014

Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). The Travel of Ideas . In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879735.13

EXPONENTIAL CLIMATE ACTION ROADMAP. (n.d.). https://climatepledge.global/

Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2005). Organizational routines and the macro-actor. In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (Eds.), Actor-network theory and organizing . Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

Fuglsang, L. (2009). Development from bilateral PPPs to multilateral ServPPIN, contribution to Work Package 3, ServPPIN report.

Gaziulusoy, Ï., & Öztekin, E. E. (2019). Design for sustainability transitions: Origins, attitudes and future directions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133601

Geels, F. W. (2018). Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration ? A Socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1900-2016). Energy Research & Social Science , 46, 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008

Hertzum, M., & Simonsen, J. (2011). Effects-driven IT development - Specifying, realizing, and assessing usage effects. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 232(1), 3–28.

Horne, R., & Dalton, T. (2014). Transition to low carbon? An analysis of socio-technical change in housing renovation. Urban Studies, 51(16), 3445–3458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013516684

Kim, Y., Lee, J., & Ahn, J. (2019). Innovation towards sustainable technologies: A socio-technical perspective on accelerating transition to aviation biofuel. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.002

Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association . In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 261–277). Routledge and Kegan Paul .

Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications . Soziale Welt , 369–381.

Mohamad, M., & Songthaveephol, V. (2020). Clash of titans: The challenges of socio-technical transitions in the electrical vehicle technologies – the case study of Thai automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119772

Nielsen, P., & Birken, S. A. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of Implementation Science . Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975995

Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce, selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press .

Rohracher, H. (2001). Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320120040491

Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design . Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769

Scheuer, J. D. (2021). How Ideas Move - Theories and Models of Translation in Organizations . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424540

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press

Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Georgetown University Press .

Wæraas, A., & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). Translation Theory ‘Translated’: Three Perspectives on Translation in Organizational Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 236–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12092

Winter, S. (2007). Implementering og effektivitet (6th ed.). Systime Academic.

Appendix 1. Ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellens grundantagelser og implikationer

Publiceret
2022-07-03
Sektion
Artikler