Ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellen

Betydning for ledelse af bæredygtig innovation i offentlig-private innovations-grupper

  • John Damm Scheuer
Nøgleord: Oversættelse, Ledelse, Ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellen, Innovation, Offentlig-private innovationsnetværk, Bæredygtighed, Bæredygtig omstilling, Samskabelse, Effektdrevet participatorisk design

Resumé

Denne artikel tager udgangspunkt i, at løsning af klima- og CO2-udledningskrisen kræver oversættelse og samskabelse af nye socio-tekniske løsninger i offentlig-private inno-vationsnetværk- og grupper. Den redegør for ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellens socio-tekniske forståelse af sådanne samskabelses-, design- og oversættelsesprocesser og for, hvad de ledelsesmæssige konsekvenser af den er i den forbindelse. Endelig diskuteres, hvordan processen vil kunne accelereres på den baggrund.

Forfatterbiografi

John Damm Scheuer

John Damm Scheuer er lektor, ph.d., Institut for Samfundsvidenskab og -Erhverv, Roskilde Universitet.

Referencer

Adil, A. M., & Ko, Y. (2016). Socio-technical evolution of Decentralized Energy Systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 57, pp. 1025–1037). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.079

Aken, V. J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies , 41(2), 219–246.
Barrett, C., Benton, T. G., Fanzo, J., Herrero, M. T., & Nelson, R. (2020). Socio-Technical Innovation Bundles for Agri-Food Systems Transformation A Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability/ Nature Sustainability Expert Panel Report. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/index.html https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x

Bednar, P. M., & Welch, C. (2020). Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1

Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002

Chilvers, J., Pallett, H., & Hargreaves, T. (2018). Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions. Energy Research and Social Science, 42, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020

Climate Change 2021 Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Summary for Policymakers. (n.d.).

Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6

Cooren, F. (2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication , 68, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014

Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). The Travel of Ideas . In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879735.13

EXPONENTIAL CLIMATE ACTION ROADMAP. (n.d.). https://climatepledge.global/

Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2005). Organizational routines and the macro-actor. In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (Eds.), Actor-network theory and organizing . Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

Fuglsang, L. (2009). Development from bilateral PPPs to multilateral ServPPIN, contribution to Work Package 3, ServPPIN report.

Gaziulusoy, Ï., & Öztekin, E. E. (2019). Design for sustainability transitions: Origins, attitudes and future directions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133601

Geels, F. W. (2018). Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration ? A Socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1900-2016). Energy Research & Social Science , 46, 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008

Hertzum, M., & Simonsen, J. (2011). Effects-driven IT development - Specifying, realizing, and assessing usage effects. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 232(1), 3–28.

Horne, R., & Dalton, T. (2014). Transition to low carbon? An analysis of socio-technical change in housing renovation. Urban Studies, 51(16), 3445–3458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013516684

Kim, Y., Lee, J., & Ahn, J. (2019). Innovation towards sustainable technologies: A socio-technical perspective on accelerating transition to aviation biofuel. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.002

Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association . In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 261–277). Routledge and Kegan Paul .

Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications . Soziale Welt , 369–381.

Mohamad, M., & Songthaveephol, V. (2020). Clash of titans: The challenges of socio-technical transitions in the electrical vehicle technologies – the case study of Thai automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119772

Nielsen, P., & Birken, S. A. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of Implementation Science . Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975995

Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce, selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press .

Rohracher, H. (2001). Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 13(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320120040491

Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design . Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769

Scheuer, J. D. (2021). How Ideas Move - Theories and Models of Translation in Organizations . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424540

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press

Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Georgetown University Press .

Wæraas, A., & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). Translation Theory ‘Translated’: Three Perspectives on Translation in Organizational Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 236–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12092

Winter, S. (2007). Implementering og effektivitet (6th ed.). Systime Academic.

Appendix 1. Ide-praksis-oversættelsesmodellens grundantagelser og implikationer
Publiceret
2022-11-24
Sektion
Artikler