Organisatorisk oversættelse af vilde problemer – om at skabe lingvistiske rum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v39i2.7145Nøgleord:
Vilde problemer, oversættelse, lingvistiske rumResumé
Mange organisationer står i dag over for vilde problemer, der skaber dilemmaer internt i organisationen. Dette kan være samfundsmæssige problemer som bæredygtighed, økonomi, klima, økonomi, uddannelse og rekruttering eller krav fra omgivelser som CSR, profit, legitimitet, inddragelse og effektivitet, der, når de optræder på samme tid, skaber et vildt problem som organisationen må håndtere. Fælles for disse problemer er, at der er mange modsatrettede krav og fortolkninger i spil, og at de ofte vil kræve inddragelse af en række forskellige aktører. Organisationer vil derfor opleve en høj grad af kompleksitet, som de skal finde måder at håndtere. I denne artikel ser vi på, hvordan det samme vilde problem blev oversat på fire forskellige måder og førte til fire typer af oversættelser af problemet, der blev skabt i forskellige lingvistiske rum i organisationen. Disse oversættelser danner grundlaget for en varieret og flersidig håndtering af vilde problemer. Dette understreger, at vilde problemer ikke har én entydig essens, der er uafhængig af dem, der skal håndtere problemet – vilde problemer er komplekse og kan derfor opfattes og løses på forskellige måder. Opgaven for oversætterne bliver derfor at identificere, hvordan omgivelsernes krav kan oversættes til organisationen, og her bliver skabelsen af lingvistiske rum en forudsætning for at kunne foretage oversættelsen.
Referencer
Andersen, N.Å. (2002). Polyfone organisationer. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier (NOS), 4(2), 27-53.
Anderson, P., & Baumberg, B. (2006). Alcohol in Europe-public health perspective: report summary. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 13(6), 483-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630600902477
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
Besharov, M., & Smith, W. (2014). Multiple logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations' creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory & Society, 36(6), 547-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x
Callon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 244-269). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03477.x
Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E. (2005), "Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework", John Wiley & Sons
Christiansen, L., & Lounsbury, M. (2013). Strange brew: Bridging logics via institutional bricolage and the reconstitution of organizational identity. In M. Lounsbury, & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Institutional Logics in Action, Part B ed., pp. 509-542) Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Christiansen, L. H. (2014). Brewing an assortment of responses to institutional logics. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 14537). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.266
Churchman, C. W. (1967) Wicket problems. Management Science, 14: B141-B142. Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. John Wiley & Sons.
Corciolani, M., Giuliani, E., Humphreys, A., Nieri, F., Tuan, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2022). Lost and found in translation: How firms use anisomorphism to manage the institutional complexity of CSR. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12877
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). 'The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields'. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028044
Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization studies, 36(3), 363-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614563742
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Global Alcohol Policy Alliance (2013). 'Statement Of Concern - The International Public Health Community Responds to The Global Alcohol Producers' Attempts to Implement The Who Global Strategy On The Harmful Use Of Alcohol.". Retreived from: http://www.globalgapa.org/news/news050413.html(November 26th, 2013)
Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public problems, drink-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101-118.
Hermans, T. (Ed.). (2014). The manipulation of literature (routledge revivals): Studies in Literary Translation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759029
Klausen, K. K. (2021). Strategisk ledelse på de mange arenaer: i virksomheder, offentlige og frivillige organisationer. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1997(1), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1997.4981338
Lindblom, C. E. (1958). Policy analysis. American Economic Review, 48, 298-312.
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research (Online ed.) SAGE Research Methods Online.
Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university https://doi.org/10.2307/2667124
Recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), pp. 29-56.
March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003600
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1976) Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications.
Munday, J. (2009). The Routledge companion to translation studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879450
Obed Madsen, S. (2013). Lederen som oversætter: Et oversættelsesteoretisk perspektiv på strategisk arbejde. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS).
Obed Madsen, S. (2022). Implementering: Mellem snak og handling. Samfundslitteratur
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16,145-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of management review, 15(2), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/258154
Ricoeur, P. (2007). On translation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003831
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368
Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
Røvik, K. A. (2023). A Translation Theory of Knowledge Transfer: Learning Across Organizational Borders. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832362.001.0001
Scheuer, J. D. (2021). How ideas move: theories and models of translation in organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424540
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative science quarterly, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
World Health Organization. (2010). European status report on alcohol and health. Copenhagen Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatteren(ne) giver tilladelse til publicering af artiklen i det aftalte nummer. Forfatteren(ne) bevarer copyright til egne artikler.
SIS’ redaktør har ophavsretten til tidsskriftets design, navn, systematik, særpræg etc. Artikler, der er udgivet i SIS og som er fagligt godkendt af redaktionen til udgivelse, må ikke tilrettes, omredigeres, kopieres eller gengives i uddrag i andre medier uden redaktionens og forfatterens samtykke.
Artikler må ikke offentliggøres af forfatteren(ne) andetsteds uden indhentning af godkendelse fra ansvarshavende redaktør. SIS’ redaktør er dog altid forfatteren(ne) behjælpelig med at udgive artikler i særtryk samt udbrede artiklerne til andre udgivere, men kun efter aftale med forfatteren(ne) og med angivelse af, at artiklen oprindeligt blev publiceret i SIS.
