Dataficerede offentligheder – overvejelser over digitale metoder i lyset af den tidlige amerikanske pragmatisme

  • Anders Koed Madsen Redaktionssekretær, Dansk Sociologi

Abstract

Med afsæt i henholdsvist den amerikanske offentlighedssociologi fra den første halvdel af det 20. Århundrede – samt den vigtigste litteratur indenfor digitale metoder – vil denne artikel fremføre to argumenter. Det første argument er, at offentligheder ikke kan begrebsliggøres isoleret fra de materielle omstændigheder, der giver dem synlighed for sig selv og andre. Det andet argument er, at infrastrukturen omkring digitale spor og digitale metoder åbner for muligheden af at synliggøre – og dermed også begrebsliggøre – den offentlige debat ud fra et mere relationelt of processuelt perspektiv end f.eks. spørgeskemaundersøgelsen. Med afsæt i disse to argumenter introducerer artiklen fire principper, der kan være med til at guide anvendelsen af digitale metoder til at forstå offentlighedsdannelser i en digitalt medieret tid. De fire principper er a) at følge sagsdrevne offentligheder, b) se distinktioner nede fra de symboler, der udveksles af disse offentligheder, c) tage borgeres netværkspositioner med i vurderingen af deres meningers effekt og d) at være opmærksom på temaers intensitet og omskiftelighed over tid. Den praktiske konsekvenser af at følge disse principper vises gennem empiriske erfaringer fra et nyligt overstået datasprint med Teknologirådet. ENGELSK ABSTRACT: Anders Koed Madsen: Data­Publics – reflections on digital methods in the light of early American pragmatism This article introduces two arguments concerning discussions of digital methods. They are based on US public sociology from the first half of the 20th century and the most important literature within the field of digital methods. The first argument is that publics cannot be understood in isolation from the material conditions that give them visibility both for themselves (intra-public visibility) and for others. The second argument posits that the infrastructure of digital traces and digital methods affords visualizing and conceptualizing public debate from a relational and procedural perspective rather than from employing a questionnaire survey. The article introduces four principles that can help guide the use of digital methods to understand publics in a digitally mediated era. They are: a) follow issue publics, b) use the analytical distinctions from the symbols exchanged by these publics, c) take into account the network positions of citizens when assessing the impact of their opinion, and d) be aware of the intensity and interchangeability of themes over time. The practical consequences following these principles are shown through empirical experiences from a recently held data sprint with the Danish Board of Technology. Keywords: Digital methods, pragmatism, Chicago-school, publics, surveys, Lazarsfeldt.

References

Allport, Floyd H. 1937: »Toward a science of public opinion«. Public opinion quarterly, Nr. 1(1): 7-23.

Birkbak, Andreas. & Anders Kristian Munk 2017: Digitale metoder i samfunds- og humanvidenskaberne. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Blumer, Herbert 1948: »Public opinion and public opinion polling«. American sociological review, Nr. 13(5): 542-549.

Blumer, Herbert 1969: Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: PrenticeHall, Inc.

Borra, Erik., & Bernard Rieder 2014: »Programmed method: developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets«. Aslib Journal of Information Management, Nr. 66(3): 262-278.

Czitrom, Daniel J. 1982: Media and the American mind: from Morse to McLuhan. Univ of North Carolina Press.

Cooley, Charles H. 1902: Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner’s Cooley, Charles H. 1909: Social organization- A study of the larger mind. New York: Scribner’s. https://doi.org/10.1037/14788-000

Cooley, Charles H. 1912: »Valuation as a social process«. Psychological Bulletin, Nr. 9(12): 441. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070870

Celli, Fabio, Evgeny A. Stepanov, Massimo Poesio, Giuseppe Riccardi 2016: »Predicting Brexit: Classifying agreement is better than sentiment and pollsters«. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Modeling of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Social Media: 110-118.

Dewey, John 2017[1927]: Offentligheden og dens problemer. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. Dewey, John 1916: Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Prabhat Prakashan.

Dewey, John 1938: Logic-The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt

Flyverbom, M. & Madsen, A.K 2019: »Telegraph«. Oxford Handbook of Media, Technology and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gallup, George H. & S.F. Rae 1940: Pulse of democracy – The public-opinion poll and how it works. New York: Simin & Schuster.

Gerlitz, Carolin & Anne Helmond 2013: »The like economy: Social buttons and the dataintensive web«. New Media & Society.

Jacomy, Mathieu, Tomasso Venturini, Sebastien Heymann & Mathieu Bastian 2014: »ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software«. PloS ONE, Nr. 9(6)

Jensen, Torben E., Anders Koed Madsen, Morten Misfeldt, Anders Kristian Munk & Andreas Tamborg 2017: »Participatorisk Data Design: En ressource for Capacity Building«. Samskabelse og Capacity Building i den offentlige sektor. København: Hans Reitzel.

Kulturstyrelsen 2015: Social medier – brug, interesseområder og debatlyst, Tilgængelig her: https://slks.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumenter/medier/Mediernes_udvikling/ 2015/Specialrapporter/Sociale_medier/PDF-filer_dokumenter/SPECIALRAPPORT_ 2015_SOCIALE_MEDIER_ENDELIG.pdf (tilgået den 15. Februar 2018)

Latour, Bruno nd; Bruno Latour on Mapping Controversies. Tilgængelig her:: http://mappingcontroversies.net/Home/PlatformMappingControversiesVideoIntroduction (tilgået den 15. Februar 2018)

Latour, Bruno, Pablo Jensen, Tomasso Venturini, Sébastian Grauwin & Dominique Boullier 2012: »The whole is always smaller than its parts’ – a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads«. The British journal of sociology, Nr. 63(4): 590-615.

Lazarsfeld, Paul & Robert K. Merton 1948: »Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action«. The Communication of ideas (eds L.Bryson). New York: Harper: 95-118.

Lomborg, Stine & Anja Bechmann 2014: »Using APIs for data collection on social media«. The Information Society, Nr. 30(4): 256-265.

Madsen, Anders K. 2012: »Web-visions as controversy lenses«. Interdisciplinary Science Review, Nr. 37(1).

Madsen, Anders K. 2015: »Tracing Data – Paying Attention – Interpreting digital methods through valuation studies and Gibson’s theory of perception«. Making Things Valuable (eds Kornberger et al). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Madsen, Anders K. 2017: »Mellem algoritmisk automatik og faglig intuition – en caseanalyse af digitale metoder som participatorisk datadesign«. Digitale Metoder. Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.

Madsen, Anders K. 2016 »Beyond the Bubble: Three empirical reasons for re-conceptualizing online visibility«. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, Nr. 31(59), 22.

Marres, Norrtje 2005: »Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate«. Making things public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press: 208-217.

Marres, Noortje, & Javier Lezaun, 2011: »Materials and devices of the public: An introduction«. Economy and society, Nr. 40(4): 489-509.

Marres, Noortje, & Esther Weltevrede 2013: »Scraping the social? Issues in live social research«. Journal of Cultural Economy. Nr. 6(3): 313-335.

Marres, Noortje & Carolin Gerlitz 2016: »Interface methods: Renegotiating relations between digital social research, STS and sociology«. The Sociological Review, Nr. 64(1): 21- 46.

Miller, Daniel 2016: Social media in an English village. London: UCL Press.

Munk, Anders K., Tommaso Venturini & Axel Meunier 2017: »Data Sprints: A Collaborative Format in Digital Controversy Mapping«. Digital STSHandbook. Princeton University Press.

Munk, Anders K., Mette Abildgaard, Andreas Birkbak & Morten K. Petersen 2016:. »ReAppropriating Instagram for Social Research«. #smsociety Proceedings (acm).

Pew Research Center 2016: Social media update 2016, Tilgængelig her: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/11/10132827/PI_2016.11.11_Social-MediaUpdate_FINAL.pdf (tilgået 15. Februar 2018)

Pinter, Amdrej 2003: »Thought News a Quest for Democratic Communication Technology«. Javnost-The Public, Nr. 10(2): 93-104.

Rieder, Bernard 2012: »What is in PageRank? A historical and conceptual investigation of a recursive status index«. Computational Culture, Nr. 2.

Rogers, Richard 2004: Information politics on the Web. MIT Press.

Rogers, Richard 2009: The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Amsterdam University Press.

Rogers, Richard 2013: Digital methods. MIT press.

Rogers, Richard & Noortje Marres 2000: »Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web«. Public Understanding of Science, Nr. 9(2): 141-163

Venturini, Tomasso 2011: »What is second-degree objectivity and how could it be represented«. Séminaire W2S.

Venturini, Tomaso 2012: »Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods«. Public Understanding of Science, Nr. 21(7): 796-812.

Venturini, Tomasso, Axel Meunier, Anders K. Munk, Eric Borra, Bernard Rieder, Michéle Mauri, Matteo Azzi, Daniele Ciminieri, Giorgio Uboldi, Andreas Kaltenbrunner & David Laniado 2014: »Climaps by EMAPS in 2 pages (a summary for policy makers and busy people)«.

Venturini, Tomasso, Donato Ricci, Michéle Mauri, Lucy Kimbell & Axel Meunier 2015: »Designing controversies and their publics«. Design Issues, Nr. 31(3): 74-87.

Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun 2015: Situated intervention: Sociological experiments in health care. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Published
2018-04-05