Til forsvar for kvalitative intervju

  • Eivind Grip Fjær Redaktionssekretær, Dansk Sociologi

Abstract

To kritikker fra prominente sosiologer har de siste årene dratt i tvil nytten av kvalitative intervjudata for å si noe pålitelig om sosiale praksiser utenfor intervjusituasjonen. Den ene tar utgangspunkt i at folk ikke alltid handler slik de sier at de gjør, den andre kritikken i at folk ikke har diskursiv tilgang til sin praktiske kunnskap. Kritikkene impliserer at alt av intervjudata må behandles som fordreide av informantenes holdninger eller misoppfatninger. Kritikkene innebærer også en antakelse om at intervjudata ikke blir analysert med noen distanse til informantenes holdninger. Jeg mener at både implikasjonen og antakelsen er urimelige, og vil svare på dem med å dra fram tre teknikker som forskere som benytter seg av intervju ofte bruker: sammenligning, leting etter flere indikatorer og vurderinger av sammenheng med tidligere forskning. Ved blant annet å bruke disse teknikkene i analysen av intervjudata kan forskere dra valide konklusjoner også om forhold utenfor intervjusituasjonen. ENGELSK ABSTRACT Eivind Grip Fjær: In defense of qualitative interviews In recent years several prominent sociologists have argued that qualitative interviews are inadequate for making valid claims about social practices outside of the interview situation. One critique is based on the distinction between what people do and what they say they do, another on theories arguing that people do not have discursive access to their practical knowledge. These critiques imply that researchers should treat all interview data as distorted by informants’ attitudes and misunderstandings. They also rest on the assumption that interview data analysis lacks distance to informants’ attitudes. I argue that both the implication and the assumption are unreasonable, and will reply to them by pointing to three techniques commonly applied by researchers who use interview data: comparison, search for multiple indicators, and evaluation of consistency with previous research. In part by using these techniques in their analysis of interview data, researchers are able to make valid claims about practices outside of the interview situation. Keywords: Interview, qualitative method, action, attitude.

References

Armstrong, E.A., Hamilton, L., Armstrong, E.M. & Seeley, J.L. 2014: ««Good Girls»: gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus». Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2): 100-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514521220

Atkinson, P. & Coffey, A. 2003: «Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing». Inside interviewing: new lenses, new concerns: 415-428.

Becker, H.S. 1958: «Problems of inference and proof in participant observation». American Sociological Review, 23(6): 652-660.

Becker, H.S. & Geer, B. 1957: «Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison». Human Organization, 16(3): 28-32. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.16.3.k687822132323013

Bourdieu, P. 1990: The logic of practice (R. Nice, Overs.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C. & Passeron, J.-C. 1991: The craft of sociology: epistemological preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856460

Bourgois, P. 2003: In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bræck, L. 2006: «Christine er en hore». Samtiden, 115(04): 64-75.

Dean, J.P. & Whyte, W.F. 1958: «How do you know if the informant is telling the truth?».

Human Organization, 17(2): 34-38. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.17.2.55385ht75n416qp5

Deutscher, I. 1973: What we say/what we do: sentiments & acts. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Co.

DiMaggio, P. 2014: «Comment on Jerolmack and Khan, «Talk is cheap: ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy». Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2): 232-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114526371

Dingwall, R. (1997). «Accounts, interviews and observations». I G. Miller & R. Dingwall (red.), Context and Method in Qualitative Research (s. 52-65). London: Sage.

Fjær, E.G. & Pedersen, W. 2015: «Drinking and moral order: drunken comportment revisited». Addiction Research & Theory, 23(6): 449-458. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015. 1028922

Fjær, E.G., Pedersen, W. & Sandberg, S. 2015: ««I’m not one of those girls»: boundary-work

and the sexual double standard in a liberal hookup context». Gender & Society, 29(6): 960-981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602107

Giddens, A. 1986: The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Goffman, E. 1959: The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

Grundetjern, H. 2018: «Negotiating motherhood: variations of maternal identities among women in the illegal drug economy». Gender & Society, 32(3): 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218759006

Hammersley, M. 2003: «Recent radical criticism of interview studies: any implications for the sociology of education?». British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1): 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690301906

Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. 1995: Ethnography: principles in practice (2nd ed. utg.). London: Routledge.

Jerolmack, C. & Khan, S. 2014a: «Talk is cheap: ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy». Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2): 178-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523396

Jerolmack, C. & Khan, S. 2014b: «Toward an understanding of the relationship between accounts and action». Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2): 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523397

Järvinen, M. 2001: «Accounting for trouble: identity negotiations in qualitative interviews with alcoholics». Symbolic Interaction, 24(3): 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.3.263

Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. 2015: Det kvalitative forskningsintervju (T.M. Anderssen & J. Rygge, Overs. 3. utg. utg.). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.

Lamont, M. & Swidler, A. 2014: «Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing». Qualitative Sociology, 37(2): 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z

Lizardo, O. 2017: «Improving cultural analysis». American Sociological Review, 82(1): 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416675175

Lizardo, O. & Strand, M. 2010: «Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology». Poetics, 38(2): 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003

Martin, J.L. 2010: «Life’s a beach but you’re an ant, and other unwelcome news for the sociology of culture». Poetics, 38(2): 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.004

Maruna, S. & Copes, H. 2005: «What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?». Crime and Justice, 32: 221-320. https://doi.org/10.1086/655355

Mills, C.W. 1940: «Situated actions and vocabularies of motive». American Sociological Review, 5(6): 904-913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524

Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S. & Watson, P. 1998: «Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature».

Orford, J., Guthrie, S., Nicholls, P., Oppenheimer, E., Egert, S. & Hensman, C. 1975: «Self-reported coping behavior of wives of alcoholics and its association with drinking outcome». Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36(9): 1254-1267. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1975.36.1254

Patton, M.Q. 2002: Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3 utg.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Pugh, A.J. 2013: «What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis». AJCS, 1(1): 42-68. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2012.4

Silverman, D. 2014: Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed. utg.). Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE.

Swidler, A. 1986: «Culture in action: symbols and strategies». American Sociological Review, 51(2): 273-286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521

Trow, M. 1957: «Comment on «Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison»». Human Organization, 16(3): 33-35. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.16.3.cx277m417x00w647

Vaisey, S. 2009: «Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action». American Journal of Sociology, 114(6): 1675-1715. https://doi.org/10.1086/597179

Vaisey, S. 2014a: «The «attitudinal fallacy» is a fallacy: why we need many methods to study culture». Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2): 227-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523395

Vaisey, S. 2014b: «Is interviewing compatible with the dual-process model of culture?». AJCS, 2(1): 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2013.8

Weiss, R.S. 1994: Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.

Wilson, T.D. 2002: Strangers to ourselves: discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Wiseman, J.P. 1980: «The «home treatment»: the first steps in trying to cope with an alcoholic husband». Family Relations, 29(4): 541-549. https://doi.org/10.2307/584470

Published
2019-09-22
Section
Artikler