At få en idé til at vokse og gro
Et feltstudie af drifts- og innovationslogikker i sundhedssektoren
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v35i4.6015Nøgleord:
Offentlig sektor, Innovation, sociale relationer, driftslogik, innovationslogik, observation, sundhedResumé
Artiklen løfter sløret for, hvordan samspillet mellem forskellige tankelogikker kan forbedre innovationsprocesser i den offentlige sektor. Via et observationsstudie af Region Nordjyllands regionale innovationsenhed undersøger jeg, hvordan drifts- og innovationslogikker spiller sammen i innovationsprocessen. De empiriske analyser indikerer, at en løbende vekselvirkning mellem de to logikker forbedrer vilkårene for, at innovationsprocessen lykkes ved, at noget ukendt (innovationslogik) konkretiseres i forhold til den kendte praksis (driftslogik). Artiklen viser også, hvordan arbejdet med innovation relaterer sig til arbejdsmiljø og -glæde, idet teams der formår at foretage en løbende vekselvirkning mellem de to logikker, også udviser større drive og lyst til at innovere, mens drivet og lysten synes mere forladt i teams, der ikke formår at foretage en løbende vekselvirkning.
Referencer
Aaen, J., Nielsen, J.A. & Elmholdt, K.T. (2018). 10 år med velfærdsteknologi: Strategi og praksis. Samfundslederskab i Skandinavien, 33(3), 236-259. https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v33i3.5552
Arrow, K.J. (1973). Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency. Public Policy. 21, 303-317.
Barth, F. (1967). The role of the entrepreneur in social change in northern Norway. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
Becker, M.H. (1970). Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093205
Bjerregaard, T. & Lauring, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship as Institutional Change: Strategies of Bridging Institutional Contradictions. European Management Review, 9(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01026.x
Brix, J. (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.05.001
Brix, J. (2019a). Ambidexterity and organizational learning: revisiting and reconnecting the literatures. The Learning Organization, 26(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-02-2019-0034
Brix, J. (2019b). Innovation capacity building: An approach to maintaining balance between exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 26(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-08-2018-0143
Choi, T., & Chandler, S.M. (2015). Exploration, Exploitation, and Public Sector Innovation: An Organizational Learning Perspective for the Public Sector. Human Service Organizations, Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1011762
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406
Damanpour, F. & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(97)00029-5
Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M., Avellaneda, C.N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organization. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
de Vries, H.A., Bekkers, V.J.J.M. & Tummers, L.G. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
Digmann, A. (2013). Kommunen som innovationslaboratorium. Økonomistyring & Informatik, 28, 289-320.
Downs, G.W. & Mohr, L.B. (1976). Conceptual Issues in the Study of Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 700-714. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391725
Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. I R.H. Killman, L.R. Pondy & D. Sleven (Red.), The Management of Organization, 167–188. New York: North Holland.
Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J.-F. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.002
Edmondson, A. C., & Nembhard, I. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00341.x
Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Galbraith, J.R. (1982). Designing the Innovating Organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10(3), 5-25.
Gibson, C.B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
Goul Andersen, J. (2019). Denmark: The Welfare State as Victim of Neoliberal Policy Failure? I Stefán Ólafsson et al. (red.), Welfare and the Great Recession: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830962.003.0011
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Granovetter, M.S. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structures: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Halvorsen, T., Hauknes, J., Miles, I., Røste, R. (2005). On the Differences between Public and Private Sector Innovation. Oslo: PUBLIN.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnograhpy: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
Hansen, M.B. & Jakobsen, M.L.F. (2013). Offentligt sektor-innovation: Hvad er det? Og hvad er værd at vide om det? Politica, 45(3), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v45i3.69766
Hastrup, K. (2010). Feltarbejde. I S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (red.), Kvalitative Metoder: En grundbog, 55-80.
Hoholm, T. (2009). The Contrary Forces of Innovation: an Ethnography of Innovation Processes in the Food Industry. Ph.D. afhandling, Norwegian School of Management.
Hoholm, T. & Araujo, L. (2011). Studying innovation in real-time: The promises and challenges of ethnography. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 933-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.036
Holm, G. (2016). Drift & udvikling – sådan får du det til at gå hånd I hånd. København: Books on Demand GmbH.
Höglund, L. & Svärdsten, F. (2018). Strategy work in the public sector—A balancing act of competing discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(3), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.06.003
Klitmøller, A., Lauring, J. & Jonasson, C. (2006). Entreprenørskab I den offentlige forvaltning – en eksplorativ undersøgelse af innovation i et processuelt perspektiv. Konferencebidrag til Det Danske Ledelsesakademi, 11.-12. december 2006, København.
Klitmøller, A., Lauring, J. & Jonasson, C. (2007). Medarbejderdreven innovation i den offentlige sektor. Ledelse og Erhvervsøkonomi, 71(4), 207-216.
Kristiansen, S. & Krogstrup, H.K. (2015). Deltagende observation: introduktion til en samfundsvidenskabelig metode. 2. udgave. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Roldán, J. L., Ariza-Montes, J. A. & Leal-Millán, A. (2014). From potential absorptive capacity to innovation outcomes in project teams: The conditional mediating role of the realized absorptive capacity in a relational learning context. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6), 894-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.005
Lindh de Montoya, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship and culture: The case of Freddy the strawberry man. I R. Swedberg (red.), Entrepreneurship: The social science view, s. 322-355.
Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y. & Veiga, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
Mohr, L.B. (1969). Determinants of Innovation in Organizations. American Political Science Review, 63, 111-126.
OECD (2010). The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083479-en
OECD (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data on innovation. Paris: OECD.
O'Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Osborne, S.P. & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK: The Word That Would be King? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. & Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Røste, R. 2005. Studies of Innovation in the Public Sector. Oslo: PUBLIN.
Simonsen, J.B. (2012). Drivers and barriers for employee-driven innovation at 3 Scandinavian hospitals – An anthropological field study. Kask Innovation.
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J.F. & Souder, D. (2009). A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
Smith, E. & Umans, T. (2015). Organizational Ambidexterity at the Local Government Level: The effects of managerial focus. Public Management Review, 17(6), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.849292
Subramanian, A. & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance. Omega, 24(6), 631-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0483(96)00031-x
Thomas, P., McCulloch, J., While, A., Bosanquet, N., Ferlie, E. (2005). Increasing Capacity for Innovation in Bureaucratic Primary Care Organization: A Whole System Participatory Action Research Project. Annals of Family Medicine, 3(4), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.309
Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). The Ambidextrous Organization: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30.
Ulhøi, J.P. (2005). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Technovation, 25(8), 939-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.003
Van Maanen, J. (2011). Ethnography as Work: Rules of Engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00980.x
Walker, R.M. (2008). An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591-615. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum026
Watson, T.J. (2011). Ethnography, Reality, and Truth: The Vital Need for Studies of ’How Things Work’ in Organizations and Management. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 202-217 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00979.x
Watson, T.J. (2012). Making organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography. 1(1), 15-22.
Watson, T.J. & Watson, H.W. (2012). Narratives in society, organizations and individual identities: An ethnographic study of pubs, identity work and pursuits of ‘the real’. Human Relations, 65(6), 683-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712440586
Wolfe, R.A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique And Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatteren(ne) giver tilladelse til publicering af artiklen i det aftalte nummer. Forfatteren(ne) bevarer copyright til egne artikler.
SIS’ redaktør har ophavsretten til tidsskriftets design, navn, systematik, særpræg etc. Artikler, der er udgivet i SIS og som er fagligt godkendt af redaktionen til udgivelse, må ikke tilrettes, omredigeres, kopieres eller gengives i uddrag i andre medier uden redaktionens og forfatterens samtykke.
Artikler må ikke offentliggøres af forfatteren(ne) andetsteds uden indhentning af godkendelse fra ansvarshavende redaktør. SIS’ redaktør er dog altid forfatteren(ne) behjælpelig med at udgive artikler i særtryk samt udbrede artiklerne til andre udgivere, men kun efter aftale med forfatteren(ne) og med angivelse af, at artiklen oprindeligt blev publiceret i SIS.
