At få en idé til at vokse og gro

Et feltstudie af drifts- og innovationslogikker i sundhedssektoren

Forfattere

  • Søren Frank Etzerodt Kulturministeriet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v35i4.6015

Nøgleord:

Offentlig sektor, Innovation, sociale relationer, driftslogik, innovationslogik, observation, sundhed

Resumé

Artiklen løfter sløret for, hvordan samspillet mellem forskellige tankelogikker kan forbedre innovationsprocesser i den offentlige sektor. Via et observationsstudie af Region Nordjyllands regionale innovationsenhed undersøger jeg, hvordan drifts- og innovationslogikker spiller sammen i innovationsprocessen. De empiriske analyser indikerer, at en løbende vekselvirkning mellem de to logikker forbedrer vilkårene for, at innovationsprocessen lykkes ved, at noget ukendt (innovationslogik) konkretiseres i forhold til den kendte praksis (driftslogik). Artiklen viser også, hvordan arbejdet med innovation relaterer sig til arbejdsmiljø og -glæde, idet teams der formår at foretage en løbende vekselvirkning mellem de to logikker, også udviser større drive og lyst til at innovere, mens drivet og lysten synes mere forladt i teams, der ikke formår at foretage en løbende vekselvirkning.

Forfatterbiografi

Søren Frank Etzerodt, Kulturministeriet

Søren Frank Etzerodt er ansat som fuldmægtig i Kulturministeriet og uddannet cand.scient.adm. Artiklen er alene udtryk for forfatterens holdning. 

Referencer

Aaen, J., Nielsen, J.A. & Elmholdt, K.T. (2018). 10 år med velfærdsteknologi: Strategi og praksis. Samfundslederskab i Skandinavien, 33(3), 236-259. https://doi.org/10.22439/sis.v33i3.5552

Arrow, K.J. (1973). Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency. Public Policy. 21, 303-317.

Barth, F. (1967). The role of the entrepreneur in social change in northern Norway. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

Becker, M.H. (1970). Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093205

Bjerregaard, T. & Lauring, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship as Institutional Change: Strategies of Bridging Institutional Contradictions. European Management Review, 9(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01026.x

Brix, J. (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.05.001

Brix, J. (2019a). Ambidexterity and organizational learning: revisiting and reconnecting the literatures. The Learning Organization, 26(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-02-2019-0034

Brix, J. (2019b). Innovation capacity building: An approach to maintaining balance between exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 26(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-08-2018-0143

Choi, T., & Chandler, S.M. (2015). Exploration, Exploitation, and Public Sector Innovation: An Organizational Learning Perspective for the Public Sector. Human Service Organizations, Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1011762

Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406

Damanpour, F. & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(97)00029-5

Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M., Avellaneda, C.N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organization. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x

de Vries, H.A., Bekkers, V.J.J.M. & Tummers, L.G. (2016). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Digmann, A. (2013). Kommunen som innovationslaboratorium. Økonomistyring & Informatik, 28, 289-320.

Downs, G.W. & Mohr, L.B. (1976). Conceptual Issues in the Study of Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 700-714. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391725

Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. I R.H. Killman, L.R. Pondy & D. Sleven (Red.), The Management of Organization, 167–188. New York: North Holland.

Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J.-F. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.002

Edmondson, A. C., & Nembhard, I. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00341.x

Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: S