Human Rights and the 1980 U.S. Presidential Election

Authors

  • Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard Lund University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v52i2.6497

Keywords:

U.S. foreign policy, Human rights, The 1980 presidential election, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan

Abstract

Due to dramatic developments in international affairs and the starkly diverging foreign policy visions of the two candidates, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, foreign policy occupied a usually prominent role in the 1980 U.S. presidential election. A central component of the foreign policy debate was the appropriate role for human rights concerns in American foreign relations. Nevertheless, neither historians of U.S. presidential elections nor historians of human rights have devoted much attention to the issue. This article represents the first comprehensive study of the role of human rights in the 1980 U.S. presidential election. First, it examines the role of human rights in the foreign policy visions of the presidential candidates, focusing especially on Reagan’s criticism of Carter’s human rights policy. Second, it assesses the impact the issue of human rights had on the 1980 election and the way the 1980 election shaped the role of human rights in U.S. foreign policy.

Author Biography

Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, Lund University

Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard is a Marie Curie Fellow at Human Rights Studies at Lund University and an incoming Senior Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies. Previously, he was a postdoc at Georgetown University. He is the author of Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2020) and several articles in journals such as Journal of Cold War Studies, Diplomacy & Statecraft, and International Politics.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-01

How to Cite

Søndergaard, R. S. (2020). Human Rights and the 1980 U.S. Presidential Election. American Studies in Scandinavia, 52(2), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v52i2.6497