At the recent 16th Party Congress a comprehensive change of the Chinese
leadership was carried through. Even though there was much
speculation as to whether Jiang Zemin and his generation would retire
as scheduled, the change of the old guard took place without much
drama when the congress finally convened in Beijing.
How do we evaluate this development? Does it mean that Chinese
politics have matured in the sense that major decisions now conform to
fixed rules and regulations rather than factional politics? Has the Chinese
political process become more transparent? Have consensual decision-
making processeses finally taken over, relegating patrimonial
policies to a phenomenon of the past? Since the mid-1990s, clear and
detailed regulations for the selection and appointment of leading cadres
have been promulgated. Is the 16th Party Congress the final step in
this process of procedural normativization? Before attempting to answer
these questions, this paper will first deal with the personnel
changes that took place at the 16th Party Congress and the Central Committee
(CC) meeting shortly after the conclusion of the conference.
Author Biography
Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard, Copenhagen Business School
Professor, Director of Asia Research Centre
Copenhagen Business School
Porcelænshaven 24
DK-2000 Frederiksberg